MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893905846 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6262018

Krisna bakeri Viraktamath, 2006, sp. nov.

2006· article· en· W6893905846 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeApex (geometry)Margin (machine learning)Basal (medicine)DorsumHindlimb

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Krisna bakeri sp. nov. Figs 22, 30, 32, 36–46 Green to greenish ochraceous with red tinge. Vertex with rounded anterior margin between eyes, medially slightly longer than next to eyes. Frons slightly depressed beneath anterior margin with coarse sculpturing. Hind wings milky white. Male abdominal terga 2, 3 and 4 with apodemes (Figs 38–40). Male eighth sternite widened in distal half, lateral angles of hind margin rounded, caudal margin almost straight with several spines on ventral surface. Male genitalia: Ventral pygophore process broad in basal 0.33, narrowed and of uniform width in middle 0.33, then broadened gradually and narrowed to pointed apex, apical area with a few longitudinal rugae, dorsal margin of process in some specimens serrated at midlength. Style of type 1. Aedeagus with preatrium well developed, shaft broadest at basal 0.25, then narrowed to apex, ventral margin rather straight, dorsal margin concave, with serrated margin, short rugae, and denticles. Female genitalia: Hind margin of seventh sternite broader than long, rather rectangular, hind margin slightly produced in middle. Second pair of gonapophysis with smooth area between distal and middle teeth, apex rather broadly rounded, without subapical ventral notch. Measurements: Male 10.40 mm long (10.30–10.70), 2.55 mm wide across eyes, 3.15 (3.10–3.30) mm wide across hind margin of pronotum. Female 11.40 mm long, 2.70 mm wide across eyes, 3.30 mm wide across hind margin of pronotum. Material examined: Nepal: Holotype ď, Katmandu, 12.vi.1978, V.K. Thapa (UAS). Paratypes: Nepal: 3 ď, 1 Ψ, data as for holotype (BMNH, IARI, UAS); 3 Ψ, Katmandu, Kokari-Takha, 28.x-14.xi.1978, V.K. Thapa (UAS); 14 ď, 1Ψ, near Simra, Adhobhar, collected on 25 (6 ď), 27 (4 ď), 28 (4 ď, 1Ψ), viii.1967, Canadian Nepal Expedition; 4 ď, 1Ψ, Katmandu: Godavari, 6000’ (1820 m), 15.vii (1 ď), 24.vii (1 ď), 31. vii (1Ψ), 30.viii (2 ď), 1969, Canadian Nepal Expedition (CNC). Other material: Nepal: 4 nymphs from Bhartpur, Birganj (CNC); India: Uttaranchal: 1 ď, Dehradun, 27.iv.1975, C.A. Viraktamath; West Bengal: 1 Ψ, 8 km E Kalimpong, 1768 m, 29.x.1981, C.A. Viraktamath (UAS). Remarks: K. bakeri resembles K. strigicollis but in addition to differences in the male genitalia, it differs in lacking the black spots on the anterior margin of vertex, anterior rim of the head and ocelli are placed a distance more than half own diameter away from the adjacent eye; but in K. strigicollis they are much closer. The male third sternal apodemes are short and broad whereas in K. strigicollis they are widely separated, and reach anteriorly the second segment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207