Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prochyliza inca McAlpine, 1977 Prochyliza inca McAlpine 1977: 46. Type locality: Ecuador (Azuay). Holotype (♂) and paratypes (4 ♀) in CNC. Material examined. 1 ♀ (CNC, paratype): Ecuador, Azuay, Tarqui; 07–08.iii.1965. 1 ♂ (CNC): Ecuador, Azuay, Santa Isabel; 10–13.iii.1965; det. A. L. Ozerov. Diagnosis. The two horn-like spines on the epandrium of P. i n c a males (Fig. 5 D) are extremely distinctive. The following combination of characters is also distinctive of P. i nc a: lower quarter or less of the frons orange; gena black; front coxa entirely yellow; mid and hind femora and mid and hind tibiae mostly black; margins and fringes of calypters brownish; males with posterior margin of sternite 5 strongly emarginated. Remarks. According to McAlpine (1977), P. azteca would be the most closely related species to P. inca. In the absence of a description for P. azteca male morphology, the presence of two horn-like spines on the epandrium of P. inca (Fig. 5 D) appears to be an unique character among the Piophilidae. Biology. Unknown. Distribution. Neotropical; only recorded from Ecuador (McAlpine 1977; Ozerov & Norrbom 2010).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".