Haploniscus spinifer Hansen 1916
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Haploniscus spinifer Hansen, 1916 Haploniscus spinifer Hansen, 1916: 31, pl. II, figs 3a–3h.— Menzies 1962: 98.— Wolff 1962: 59.— Chardy 1974: 496, 523.— Lincoln 1985b: 662 –663.—Kussakin 1988: 396–397, figs 333–334.— Brökeland and Wägele 2004: 237 –238, fig. 2 (Electronic supplement, 4–6, figs 13–25). Material examined. BIOICE stn. 2859, RV Bjarni Saemundsson, RP sled, 29 August 1995, 61°5022N, 16°5286W, 2270 m, 2.37°C, 39 specimens (IMNH 37022); BIOICE stn. 2860, RV Bjarni Saemundsson, RP sled, 30 August 1995, 61°4343N, 16°5748W, 2295 m, 2.60°C, 57 specimens (IMNH 37023). Remarks. Hansen (1916) described H. spinifer from specimens collected at depths of 1505–3474 m in the Labrador basin and at the eastern margin of the deep Reykjanes Ridge. Here, the species was only found at two deep stations south of the Ridge in the Iceland basin (Fig. 11 C). Lincoln (1985b) did not report the species from the Rockall Trough or the Porcupine Sea-Bight. The species has a very wide distribution and has been reported in the South Atlantic Ocean (Brökeland & Wägele 2004) and in even in the Southern Ocean (see Meyer-Löbbecke et al. 2014), and has been suggested to be a potential species complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".