Mycale (Arenochalina) laxissima
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mycale (Arenochalina) laxissima (Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864) Tables 6, 7; Figs. 52A–D, 58G Synonymy and references: Acamas laxissima Duchassaing & Michelotti (1864: 95), and Muricy et al. (2011: 154); Acamasina laxissima de Laubenfels (1936: 117); Mycale hyatti Pulitzer-Finali (1986: 128); Mycale jamaicaensis Pulitzer-Finali (1986: 125); Mycale mucifliens Pulitzer-Finali (1986: 121); Mycale whitfieldi Pulitzer-Finali (1986: 127); Hircinia cartilaginea var. horrida, Esperella nuda, Mycale angulosa, Mycale nuda, Mycale (Acamasina) laxissima, Mycale (Arenochalina) laxissima, and Thorecta horridus: see references compiled in Muricy et al. (2011: 154); Mycale laxissima: Gómez (2002: 81), Hajdu et al. (2011: 165), and Muricy et al. (2011: 154). Type locality. St. Thomas (US Virgin Islands). Material examined. CNPGG-2416, Isla Verde reef (19.19844°N, 96.06863°W), 8 m depth, coll. Diana Ugalde, 28 August 2018; CNPGG-1234, Madagascar reef (21.43847°N, 90.2810°W), 12 m depth, coll. Diana Ugalde, 29 May 2012; CNPGG-1825, Alacranes reef (22.2701°N, 89.5412°W) 8 m depth, coll. Patricia Gómez, 10 August 2009; CNPGG-1829 Alacranes reef (22.386914°N, 89.6790°W), 7 m depth, coll. Diana Ugalde, 13 December 2012; CNPGG-2267, Triangulos Oeste reef (20.96073°N, - 92.30751°W), 20 m depth, coll. Oscar Bocardo, 10 September 2017. Distribution. Mexico (Gómez & Green 1984 as M. (A.) angulosa; current records), Bahamas, US (Florida)(Zea 1987), and Brazil (Muricy et al. 2011). Remarks. Up to now, Mycale (M.) laxissima has been reported in the SGoM (Veracruz and the Campeche Bank reefs; Gómez 2002, 2007, 2011) and Florida (de Laubenfels 1936, 1953; as Mycale angulosa). Order Polymastiida Morrow & Cárdenas, 2015
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".