Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tanycarpa gracilicornis (Nees von Esenbeck) Bassus gracilicornis Nees von Esenbeck, 1812: 206. Type: lost. Tanycarpa gracilicornis: Foerster 1862: 265, Wharton 1980: 73 (discussion), Tobias and Jakimavicius 1986: 180 (in key to European species), Chen and Wu 1994: 139 (redescription, range extension), Belokobylskij 1998: 208 (in key to species from eastern Russia). Material examined. China, Ningxia: Liupanshan, Wanghuanan, 5 ♀ 7 ♂ 20–VIII–2000, Zhihui Lin (1 ♀ 1 ♂ USNM); 1 ♀ 3 ♂ same data as previous except Quanxiu Shi (1 ♂ USNM); 4 ♀ 4 ♂ same data as previous except Qinge Ji (1 ♀ 1 ♂ USNM); 4 ♂ same data as previous except Jianquan Yang (1 USNM); 1 ♀ 1 ♂ Guanghong Liang; 1 ♂ Migangshan, 22–VIII–2000, Zhihui Lin; 1 ♀ Jingyuan, 15–VIII–2000, Quanxiu Shi; China, Hubei: 1 ♂ Shennongjia, 22–VIII–2000, Juchang Huang (all at FAFU except as noted for USNM). Diagnosis. Antenna with 30–40 flagellomeres; frons almost flat, glabrous; mandible 1.40–1.60× longer than wide; midpit long and narrow; scutellar sulcus deep, wide, with 1 strong longitudinal carina, adjacent to carina rugose or with just a few rugae; notauli distinctly crenulate anteriorly, obliterated posteriorly; midpit long and narrow; mesoscutal lobes with dense setae medially but glabrous laterally; propodeum with distinct longitudinal ridge in basal 1/4–1/5 that splits into two transverse ridges, two longitudinal ridges extend posteriorly from tubercles and form closed glabrous areola; 1cu-a small, postfurcal; legs yellow except apical 1/4 of hind tibia and entire tarsus slightly to strongly infuscate; pterostigma brown; T1 brown, metasoma except T1 brownish yellow to brown. Body 3.08–3.60 mm. Distribution. Austria; Belgium; Canada (Alberta and Ontario); China (Fujian, Ningxia, Hubei); Czechoslovakia (former); Finland; Germany; Hungary; Ireland; Italy; North Korea; Poland; Russia (Primor'ye Kray, Sakhalin Oblast, Saint Petersburg); Switzerland; United Kingdom; USA (Alaska). Remarks. Tanycarpa gracilicornis is widespread and is morphologically similar to T. mitis and T. similis based on the filiform apical three antennal flagellomeres and presence of a mesoscutal midpit. However, T. gracilicornis has 30–40 flagellomeres, T. mitis has 24–27 flagellomeres, and T. similis has 25–29 flagellomeres. As for T. mitis and T. similis, they are separated primarily using the median longitudinal ridge of the propodeum and the fore wing 2nd submarginal cell. Tanycarpa mitis has a longitudinal ridge in the basal 1/3, and the 2nd submarginal cell longer; T. similis lacks a longitudinal ridge, and the 2nd submarginal cell is shorter. In T. gracilicornis the propodeum has a distinct longitudinal ridge in the basal 1/4–1/5, and the 2nd submarginal cell is shorter as in T. similis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".