Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thienemanniella xena (Roback) Corynoneura xena Roback, 1957: 61. Thienemanniella xena (Roback) Sublette 1970: 89; Boesel & Winner 1980: 504; Hestenes & Saether 2000: 106; Makarchenko & Makarchenko 2006: 160. Material examined. CHINA: Liaoning Province, Kuandian County (40° 45’ N, 124° 46’ E), 400–1336 m a.s.l., 2 males (BDN No. 0 3367, 1422), 22.iv.1992, Xinhua Wang; Yunnan Province, Lijiang County, Agriculture-school Reservoir (26°52'N, 100°15'E), 2400 m a.s.l., 3 males (BDN No. 10735, 10733, 10736), 28.v.1996, Xinhua Wang; Yunnan Province, Yiliang County (28° 54’ N, 103° 7’ E), 1550 m a.s.l., 1 male (BDN No.09628), 2.vi.1996, Xinhua Wang; Yunnan Province, Lijiang County, Heilongtan (26°52' N, 100°15' E), 2400 m a.s.l., light trap, 1 male (BDN No.11011), 28.v.1996, Xinhua Wang; Yunnan Province, Fumin County, Daying Town (25° 12’ N, 102° 29’ E), 1870 m a.s.l., 1 male (BDN No.09573), 1.vi.1996, Xinhua Wang; Liaoning Province, Dandong County, Caohe Town (40° 08’ N, 124° 22’ E), 1 male (BDN No.1110), 1.vi.1996, Xinhua Wang; Yunnan Province, Lijiang County, Shigu Town (28° 54’ N, 103° 7’ E), 1500m a.s.l., light trap, 1 male (BDN No.10908), 25.v.1996, Changfa Zhou; Shandong Province, Yantai City, Kunyu Mountain (37° 5’ N, 121° 4’ E), 922 m a.s.l., 1 male (BDN No.1182), 24.viii.1987, Xinhua Wang; Ningxia Autonomous Region, Tongxin County (37° 18’ N, 106° 17’ E), 1400 m a.s.l., light trap, 1 male (BDN No.04952), 4.viii.1987, Xinhua Wang; Xinjiang Autonomous Region, Takeshen County (43° 53’ N, 88° 8’ E), 1100 m a.s.l., 1 male (BDN No.08057), 29.v.1987, Xinhua Wang; Fujian Province, Daiyun Mountain (25° 40’ N, 118° 10’ E), 1856 m a.s.l., 1 male (BDN No.20165), 15.ix.2002, Zheng Liu. Diagnostic characters. The species differs from other East Asian members of the genus by having an apically clubbed antenna with 12 flagellomeres; AR 0.48–0.69; 0.60; superior volsella anteriomedially fused, and in contact with the well developed almost rectangular inferior volsella. Distribution. Canada: Ontario, Alberta and Manitoba; USA: Alaska, South Dakota and New York, Florida; Russian Far East; China: Liaoning Province, Yunnan Province, Shandong Province, Ningxia Autonomous Region, Fujian Province, Xinjiang Autonomous Region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".