MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893939441 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6269031

Copris warneri McCleve and Kohlmann, sp. nov.

2005· article· en· W6893939441 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApex (geometry)Quadrate boneDorsumSolar prominenceFrench hornHead (geology)Echelon formationHolotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copris warneri McCleve and Kohlmann, sp. nov. (Figs. 1–5) Diagnosis. This species is characterized as follows: male clypeal teeth small, remote; clypeal emargination shallow, smoothly and broadly arcuate, without median notch; median pronotal prominences closely approximate (in dorsal view), exterior margins divergent, emargination between prominences deep so as to embrace head horn, each prominence narrow, each at tip subequal to width of head horn apex; median dorsal sulcus shallow, with small umbilical punctures not extending onto bifurcate process; lateral pronotal prominences reduced, not usually projecting anteriorly past anterior pronotal angles in dorsal view, in profile with upper margin directed on a line toward base of head horn; 8th elytral stria complete; 9th elytral stria complete except for basal part opposite mesoepisternum; anterior tibial spur slender, turned sharply inward and downward, apex acute. Description. Holotype. Male (Figs. 1, 3, 4): Total length: 19.3 mm. Elytral width: 10.3 mm. Clypeus with two small remote teeth; emargination shallow, smoothly and broadly arcuate, with no median notch (Fig. 3). Posterior angles of genae acute. Upper surface of head weakly umbilico­punctate, more prominent on genae, less so anteriorly, sparser and less distinct medially basal to emargination. Minute punctures evident at 25X magnification around base of horn, eyes, base of head. Occipital margin in three overlapping segments. Head horn long, apex extending above apices of medial pronotal prominences in lateral profile, smoothly curved backward. Demarcation between gula and submentum broadly V­shaped. Antennae dark brown. Pronotal anterolateral angles obtuse, lateral margin angled out near origin of lateral carina. Lateral carina more or less prominent. Anterior margin behind genae almost straight, not concave. Dorsal median longitudinal sulcus shallow, incomplete; punctures small to moderate, vaguely umbilicate. Entire surface of pronotum punctate except for elevated portions of median prominences. Dorsal surface of basal half of median prominences (except for dorsal sulcus) with evenly distributed, minute punctures; minute punctures continuing onto base of lateral prominences, becoming gradually coarser and more umbilicate toward pronotal basal margin. Posterior angles with broad area of coarse umbilical punctures, punctures smaller below lateral carina, large to moderate in lateral fossa. Entire anterior face of median prominences with widely spaced small circular, umbilicate punctures; punctures near base of median prominences narrow, elongate. Concavity between median and lateral prominences with small, widely and regularly spaced, round, umbilicate punctures. Median prominences approximate, slender; outside margins divergent; apex of each slightly wider than base, slightly wider than apex of head horn; emargination between apices deeply U­shaped, about as deep as 4 diameters of head horn apex (Fig. 4). In lateral profile each prominence has a blunt apex and a bulge on the underside, apex wider than stem. Lateral prominences small; in dorsal view angled outward toward, but not reaching, apical pronotal angles (Fig. 1); in lateral profile upper margin of lateral prominences angled slightly downward, upper margin directed toward base of head horn. Anterior face of lateral prominences more or less perpendicular to lateral margin, apex right­angled, furthest point of lateral prominences not extending over anterior margin of pronotum (Fig. 4). Anterior prosternal margin with small, triangular tooth; sternellum with about 4 irregular transverse rows of crisp, well­defined, moderateto­large, umbilicate punctures; punctures with fine, pale setae shorter than puncture width. Median lobe of metasternum densely umbilico­punctate anteriorly and laterally; median impressed line complete. Elytra with 8th stria complete; 9th stria complete except for basal segment opposite mesoepisternum (Fig. 3); 10th stria complete. Striae closely, moderately punctate; punctures slightly transverse, separated by their approximate width. Interstriae slightly convex, minutely punctate. Pygidium with margin complete; punctures umbilical, small to moderate; punctures bearing short, minute, pale setae. Genital capsule without apical hook. Ventral surface of profemora with large, setose, umbilicate punctures on posterior longitudinal half with dark setae; punctures becoming much smaller toward anterior half, then minute and apparently simple near anterior margin and bearing minute, pale setae. Protibial spurs sharply bent at almost a right angle directed inward and downward apically, apex sharp. Middle coxae with outer face densely punctate with a single row of large, umbilicate punctures or a rugose area near outer margin; then an impunctate area; then 2–3 rows of smaller, umbilicate punctures on inner half. Ventral surface of middle and posterior femora with large, umbilicate punctures distally becoming minute, simple proximally. Allotype. Female (Fig. 2): Length: 16.8 mm. Elytral width: 9.2 mm. Differs from holotype as follows: head horn short, broad, slightly expanded apically, about 1.2 mm tall, 1.4 mm wide at narrowest width near base, 1.6 mm wide at apex; apex excavated, anterior and posterior margins of apex evenly elliptical in dorsal view; lateral corners of horn apex not recurved backwards. Clypeal teeth slightly closer together, more prominent, with a broad angulation between them. Foretibial spurs not as sharply bent as in male, bent portion slightly shorter. Pronotal punctation stronger, more regular with entire pronotal surface punctate. Median pronotal prominences united, anteriorly with weak carina, carina slightly emarginate medially in dorsal view (Fig. 2). Variation. Total length 16.2–19.3 mm. Elytral width 9.0–10.3 mm. The holotype is very fresh and unworn, but some paratypes show signs of wearing. Some paratype males, compared to the holotype, show both smaller size and weaker development of the head and pronotal armament more or less in a continuum to the smallest and least developed male. These lesser males also have a smaller anterior tibial spur. One male (from Río Piedras Verdes) has the pronotum with larger punctures. Little variation was observed in females, including horn development and the nearly complete 9th elytral stria. One female has a head horn more expanded apically, much more like the horn in female C. arizonensis. Pronotal angles can be obtuse or sometimes are made salient by a feeble inward curve (this was previously a diagnostic character for the C. arizonensis complex but is now known to be variable). Material examined (12 males 7 females). Holotype, male: MEXICO. Sonora: 14.4 miles NW Yécora on Santa Rosa road, 5512 feet elevation, 8 VII 1993, UV, S. McCleve, G.E. & K.E.Ball. Allotype, female: MEXICO. Chihuahua: 4 miles N Las Chinacas, (0.8 miles S La Lovera), 4910 feet elevation, 9–10 VII 1989, UV, S. McCleve. Paratypes (11 males, 6 females): MEXICO. Chihuahua: 6 miles S Yécora (SON), 5740 feet elevation, 2–3 VII 1990, UV, S. McCleve, 1 male; 3 miles S Ignacio Zaragoza, Río Piedras Verdes, 5900 feet elevation, 11–12 VII 1988, UV, P. Jump, 1 male; same as allotype, 1 female; 86 km NE Nácori Chico (Sonora), Rancho Arroyo El Cocono, 1660 m elevation, 7 VIII 1982, ex fungi trap, S. McCleve, G. E. & K. E. Ball, 1 female; between Yepáchic & Temosáchic, large canyon bottom, 31 VIII 1984, UV, D. Mullins, 1 female. Sonora: Highway 16, 19 km W Yécora, Cañón del Aguajito, 5 VIII 2005, 28° 22' 22" N, 109° 02' 52" W, ex human dung trap, B.D. Streit & R.D. Cunningham, 1 male; Hwy 16, 1.8 mi W Yécora, 4 VIII 2005, ex human dung trap, B. Steit & R.D. Cunningham, 1 male; Hwy 161.8 road miles NW Yécora, 28° 21' 34" N, 108° 57' 06" W, 5338 feet elevation, 6 VIII 2003, B. D. Streit & R. A. Cunningham, taken in pitfall trap baited with human dung, 1 male; Highway 16, 1.3 road miles E Yécora, 28° 22' 27"N, 108° 54' 27" W, 5153 feet elevation, 5 VIII 2003, B. D. Streit & R. A. Cunningham, taken in pitfall trap baited with human dung, 1 female; Highway 16, 5.0 road miles E Yécora, 28° 23' 23" N, 108° 52' 25" W, 5647 feet elevation, 6 VIII 2003, B. D. Streit & R. A. Cunningham, taken in pitfall trap baited with human dung, 1 female; Highway 16, 5289 feet elevation, 1.65 miles W Yécora, 7–10 August 2004, 28 ° 21' 37" N, 109° 56' 59" W, R. Cunningham & B. Streit lgt, taken in human dung trap, 2 males; Highway 16, 5530 feet elevation, 5.0 miles W Yécora, 7–10 August 2004, 22 ° 21' 54" N, 108° 59' 30" W, R. Cunningham & B. Streit lg, taken in human dung trap, 1 male; Highway 16, 5386 feet elevation, 1.9 miles W Yécora, 7–10 August 2004, 28 ° 21' 29" N, 108° 57' 12"W, R. Cunningham & B. Streit lgt, taken in human dung trap, 2 males; Highway 16, 5331 feet elevation, 1.8 miles W Yécora, 6 August 2003, 28 ° 21' 34"N, 108° 57' 12" W, R. Cunningham & B. Streit lg, taken in human dung trap, 1 female; Highway 16, 7029 feet elevation, 9.1 miles E + 1.8 miles SW Yécora, 8 August 2004, 28 ° 22' 13" N, 109° 01' 53" W, R. Cunningham & B. Streit, lgt, Near Radio Tower, BL + MV, 1 male. Remarks. This species belongs to the C. arizonensis complex, as defined by Matthews (1961) and Matthews and Halffter (1968). Males of C. warneri run to couplet 13 in Matthews' 1961 first key, and fit the characters given there for C. arizonensis. In Matthews' second key males and females run to couplet 17 and fit the characters given there for C. arizonensis. Indeed, C. warneri seems to be closely related to C. arizonensis. We have seen Copris specimens from a Neotoma nest from a locality near the city of Durango that are deposited at the Canadian Museum of Nature. These specimens seem to represent a new species that is similar to C. warneri. Unfortunately, only one male specimen is known (a minor male) and more are needed to determine how this population should be classified. Distribution. All specimens of C. warneri are from the northern Sier

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207