MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893945894 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7417434

Leptocampoplex cremastoides

2022· article· en· W6893945894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMandible (arthropod mouthpart)Simple eye in invertebratesSkullMaxillaTuftWingMedian plane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leptocampoplex cremastoides (Holmgren, 1860) Figs. 7–8 Nemeritis cremastoides Holmgren, 1860: 105; Brischke, 1880: 177; Kasparyan, 1981: 403. Porizon moderator Townes, 1970: 167. Phaedroctonus cremastoides Schmiedeknecht, 1909: 1640. Material examined. 1 female, Fujian, Wuyishan Tongmucun, 26.IV.2012, Lujing Yang, No202019706; 1 female, Zhejiang, Linan Longtangshan, 29.V.2012, Pu Tang, No201205536. Redescription. Based on the female specimen from Fujian province (No202019706). Body length 6.5 mm, fore wing length 4.2 mm. Head. Antenna with at least 20 flagellomeres (apical part missing); first flagellomere ca. 4.3× longer than wide. Face (Fig. 8E) granulose. Clypeus (Fig. 8E) convex, granulose, apical margin arched. Malar space granulose, ca. 0.5× basal width of mandible. Upper tooth of mandible slightly longer than lower tooth, without lamella. Frons (Fig. 8E) granulose and without median carina. Vertex (Fig. 8F) granulose. Interocellar region (Fig. 8F) granulose. Interocellar distance 1.1× ocello-ocular distance and 1.0× distance between median and lateral ocelli; distance between lateral ocelli and eyes ca. 1.1 × as long as diameter of ocellus. Temple mat, ca. 0.35× as long as eyes in lateral view. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base. Mesosoma. Pronotum granulose dorsally and transversely striate laterally. Mesoscutum (Fig. 8G) granulose, notauli weakly present anteriorly. Scutellum and metanotum granulose. Mesopleuron (Fig. 8B) granulose, weakly transversely striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron (Fig. 8B) granulose. Propodeum (Fig. 8C) granulose; area basalis trapezoid; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris; all carina weakly developed; propodeal spiracle oval, connected to pleural carina by a distinct carina. Wing. Fore wing (Fig. 8A) areolet absent, portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu ca. 0.35× as long as 2rsm. Marginal cell short, vein RS ca. 2.5× longer than vein 2r& RS. Vein 1cu-a opposite of M& RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (60°). Hind wing with CU&cu-a inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.15. Legs. Hind femur 5.4× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia ca. 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws weakly pectinate basally. Metasoma. First segment (Fig. 8H) with glymma, ca. 3.0× longer than width of postpetiole; petiole ca. 1.25× longer than postpetiole. Second tergite ca. 1.15× longer than first tergite, 2.2× longer than its apical width; thyridium oval, its distance from basal margin of tergite ca. 5.5× its length. Third tergite 1.6× its apical width. Sixth and seventh tergites with a deep emargination dorso-medially. Ovipositor (Fig. 8D) very long and thin, slightly longer than length of metasoma, with a subapical notch on upper valve. Colour. Black. Scape and pedicel blackish brown, mandible except teeth and tegula yellow; fore and mid coxae apically, trochanters and trochantelli pale whitish, coxa basally yellowish brown, remainder of fore leg yellowish brown with apical tarsomere darker; hind coxa, trochanter and femur extreme basally, blackish, trochantellus, femur and tibia medially yellowish brown, tibia basally and apically infuscated, tarsomere blackish brown; metasoma wholly black. Variation: Antennal with 32 flagellomeres; portion of vein M between 2rs-m and 2m-cu 0.25–0.35× as long as 2rs-m; hind wing with CU&cu-a intercepted at lower 0.15–0.25. Distribution. China (Fujian, Zhejiang); Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→