MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893950547 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5098238

Dixella suzukii Chaverri and Borkent 2007, n. sp.

2007· article· en· W6893950547 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMarine Biology and Environmental Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedicelApex (geometry)LobeClawSternumThorax (insect anatomy)Dorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dixella suzukii Chaverri and Borkent n. sp. (Figures 1J, 3D, 5D, 6J, 9C, 14B, 17, 19B) Diagnosis. Male: only species of Dixidae in Central America with a short, conical gonostylus (Fig. 14B). Female: only species of Dixidae in Central America with a short lobe protruding from the lateral margin of abdominal segment 10 (Fig. 17). Description. Male. Head (Fig. 1J): brown, densely spiculate. Clypeus brown, as wide as long. Antennal scape, pedicel brown, flagellomeres yellowish. Thorax (Fig. 3D, 5D): scutum with wide dark brown medial vitta extending from anterior margin to middle of scutum, continuing as lighter, narrower brown band to supraalar area; lateral dark brown vitta broadly joined to medial vitta anteriorly near prescutal suture, extending to supraalar area, lateral margin notched above spiracular area. Scutellum, mediotergite dark brown. Pleura dark brown, somewhat patterned, except pronotum yellowish, katepisternum with yellow area on posterior margin. Wing (Fig. 6J; Table 1): with slight darkening over r-m; R2+3 originating at or distal to r-m; stem of R2+3 0.47 length of R3. Halter: pale, 0.30 length of fore femur. Legs: coxae, trochanters brown; femora yellowish with brown apices; tibiae, tarsi uniformly pale brown; claws as figured (Fig. 9C). Genitalia (Fig. 14B): tergite 9 with anterior margin somewhat concave, posterior margin straight, with numerous scattered setae. Sternite 9 with posterior margin with moderately broad excavation, with 5 elongate lateral setae. Gonocoxite as long as wide; basal lobe absent; apical lobe slightly longer than gonostylus, triangular apex with sharp ventral lobule and elongate dorsal lobule, stem with three elongate seta, one short subapical seta. Gonostylus densely spiculate, with elongate setae, broad basally, tapering gradually to apex. Parameres directed anteriorly, tips rounded, convergent. Aedeagus brown, elongate, narrow, directed posteriorly. Tergite 10 with narrow lateral band, posterolateral expansion, posteromedially with pair of protrusions. Female. As for male, with following differences: Wing (Table 2). Genitalia (Fig. 17): sternite 8 with posterior margin concave medially, medial bulge with dense patch of setae, slightly wider posteriorly, with more setae than previous sternites; tergite 9 dark brown, posterolateral margin rounded, anteroventral margin notched; sternite 9 narrow, with sublateral ventral bulge; segment 10 as long as cercus, with scattered setae, with small basal protuberance; cercus short, slightly wider at base, with elongate setae. Immatures: not described. Distribution and bionomics. This species is known from two localities in Costa Rica and two localities in Panama (Fig. 19B) at 660–1585 m. In Costa Rica the habitat in which specimens were collected corresponds to Premontane Very Wet Forest. Larvae from the type locality were collected from a seepage pool with muddy substrate in a grazing area during the dry season (April). The male from 3 km E of Cambronero, Costa Rica was reared from a larva collected from a “wide shallow seepage from roadside bank in grazing area; water semipermanent, clear, with slow current; choked with grasses; bottom with mud, much dead grass; full sun” (Heinemann and Belkin, 1977) during the rainy season (August). Adults from Panama were collected in light traps. Taxonomic discussion. We studied males and females reared from identical larvae and pupae from the type locality, indicating that they are conspecific. Heinemann and Belkin (1977) recorded this species as Dixella sp. 1 with the following specimens in the USNM labled as such: CR 352-23 and 352-25. There are additional specimens of five associated larval and pupal exuviae labeled as Dixella sp. 1 which may conspecific with D. suzukii (CR352-20-22, 24, 26) but these were not associated with any adults and therefore are of uncertain identity. Types. Holotype, male adult on microscope slide, labeled “ HOLOTYPE Dixella suzukii Chaverri and Borkent ”, “ Costa Rica, Cartago, Orosí, P.N. Tapantí-Macizo de La Muerte, orilla del puente del río Grande de Orosí, 1200 m, 27-IV-2001, B.H. Hernández, En charco, LN 259000 558850, BHB 470.30, larva and pupal exuviae associated” (INBC). Allotype, female adult on microscope slide labeled as holotype but with code BHB 470.36, (INBC). Paratypes: 5♂, 8 ♀, on microscope slides labeled as above but with codes BHB 470.13, BHB 470.14, BHB 470.38, BHB 470.22 (larva and pupal exuviae associated), BHB 470.35, BHB 470.05 (larva and pupal exuviae associated), BHB 470.12, BHB 470.21, BHB 470.37, BHB 470.24, BHB 470.27 (pupal exuviae associated), BHB 470.34, BHB 470 (3♂, 4 ♀, INBC; 1♂, 2 ♀, CNCI; 1♂, 2 ♀, USNM); 1♂, 1 ♀ on microscope slide, each with larval and pupal exuviae on separate microscope slides: Costa Rica, Alajuela, 12.7 km W of San Ramon on Natl. Rt. 1, about 3km E of Cambronero, 770 m, 13-VIII-1971, S.J. Heinemann (USNM); 1♂ on microscope slide: Panama, Chiriqui, Chiriqui ViejoR. El Volcan 22-VII-1966, A. Broce, light trap (USNM); 1 ♀ on microscope slide: Panama, David, Chiriqui, 24-VII-1964, A. Broce, light trap (USNM). Derivation of specific epithet. We name this species suzukii to honour David T. Suzuki, a Canadian environmentalist who has devoted his life teaching the public about of the state of our earth and the importance of taking better care of our world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMarine Biology and Environmental ChemistryFrench-language works237,207