Bibliographic record
Abstract
S. fuscipennis Loew, 1859 (Figs 9, 13, 17) S. fuscipennis nobilis Orth, 1986 Diagnosis. A yellowish-brown species with a short, drop-like orbital spot; deeply concave face in lateral view; pedicel index about 4.5; hypandrium not produced basally in lateral view (Fig. 9); aedeagus: midprojection absent; distiphallus about as long as epiphallus (Fig. 13); and epiphallus bilobate below apex (Fig. 17). Remarks. Orth (1986) stated that S. fuscipennis consists actually of two subspecies, the nominate form and S. fuscipennis nobilis as well as intermediate specimens. Differences concern the orbital spot and the male genitalia, especially the size and shape of the aedeagus. He also tried to delimit the distribution of both subspecies in North America and found that intermediate specimens occur in a narrow band between them at approximately 41° latitude from the east coast to 105° longitude in Kansas. But four years later Manguin (1990) tested genetic data of all three populations and came to the conclusion that because the degree of similarity is high (0.92–0.99) all populations belong to the same species showing a geographic cline in several character states rather than a well-defined subspecies. However, she did not formally synonymize the subspecies. Distribution. This is the most widely distributed Sepedon in North America known from Alaska and northern Canada to southern Texas and Florida (map: Orth 1986). Material examined. UNITED STATES: New Jersey, Clementon Co., 1.v.1904, 1 3; Washington, D. C., 28.vii.1906, 1 Ƥ, W.L. McAtee; Michigan, Washtenaw Co., Little Portage Lake, 7.x. 1937, 1 3, I. J. Cantrall; Oregon, Yamhill Co., 5 miles S of Dayton, Holdrige Creek, 11.vii.1970, 1 3, T. W. Fisher & R.E. Orth; Washington, Thurston Co., 15 miles N of Centralia, 19.vi.1969, 1 Ƥ, R. E. Orth (all USNM)..
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".