MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893976908 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6328571

NextGen Meets OldGen: Encoding an Eighteenth-Century Metadata Project

2021· article· en· W6893976908 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataDocumentationNarrativePresentational and representational actingSubject (documents)ProscriptionPresentation (obstetrics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This poster, stemming from the "Networking Jacobites" project at Simon Fraser University, reports on the challenges faced and theoretical perspectives gained in our attempts at describing an 18th-century Jacobite manuscript, “The Lyon in Mourning.” Compiled by Jacobite Episcopalian minister Robert Forbes after the suppression of the 1745 Jacobite Rising, “The Lyon in Mourning'' consists of 2148 pages of transcribed conversations, narrative accounts, poems, songs, letters, epitaphs, and even material relics such as scraps of fabric and pieces of a boat. It is an extraordinary document in Scottish history, compiled to preserve the memories of those on the losing side of the Jacobite conflict at a time when Jacobites were subject to legal proscription including capital punishment. It is also a remarkable document in the history of text encoding: not only do the ten-volumes serve as an early "hypertext" with various cross-references and footnotes throughout the collection, but Forbes' meticulously compiled manuscript also seems to anticipate the methodological protocols of the TEI, featuring careful documentation on the biographical, bibliographical, and presentational metadata about his source material. Our poster will discuss how the project has approached encoding Forbes' 10-volume manuscript and the difficulties that we have faced during the first phase of the project, which has focused on compiling metadata for each item. This metadata on the people, places, and places found in the pages of Forbes' manuscript—encoded using elements drawn from the "msdescription" and "corpus" modules of the TEI—will allow our project to derive new evidence about the extent and nature of Jacobite activity in post-1745 Scotland, despite government attempts to suppress the Jacobite cause. However, as we discuss, using TEI to analyze the work of someone who has already done his own work of encoding becomes a difficult task in itself. How do we encode the encoding?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.014
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207