MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6893977164 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6233209

Orchidophilus aterrimus Waterhouse

2008· article· en· W6893977164 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiological and pharmacological studies of plants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChampionTaxonomy (biology)CymbidiumType (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orchidophilus aterrimus (Waterhouse) Baridius aterrimus Waterhouse, 1874: 226. Lectotype male, here designated, labelled “ Type ”, yellow square, “Singa-/ pore”, handwritten [not by Waterhouse] “ Baridius / aterrimus / C. Waterhouse/ (Type.)” (BMNH). Paralectotypes: 3 males, 2 females, one pair on one card, all with round label “Singa-/ pore”, one with handwritten notes by Waterhouse “Froggatt to whom/ specimen was sent/ says this is Baris / orchivora Blkb. / 7.11.0 4. C.W.” and by Champion “wrongly/ identified/ by Froggatt” (BMNH). Acythopeus aterrimus. Lea (1906), Champion (1913, 1916), Barber (1917), Schlechter (1927), Swezey (1934), Heller (1940). Orchidophilus aterrimus. Buchanan (1935), Fullaway (1938), Hustache (1938), Swezey (1945), Pritchard (1959), Voss (1961), O’Brien & Wibmer (1982), Mau (1983), Zimmerman (1992), May (1994), Morimoto (1994), Pakaluk (1994), Hirao et al. (2001). Distribution. Native to Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and possibly Thailand; introduced and established in American Samoa, parts of Australia, Hawaii and possibly the Cook Islands, New Caledonia and Papua New Guinea; unknown if established in the Netherlands Antilles; adventive but not established in Canada, Germany, Japan, the United States and possibly in Brazil, Great Britain, the Netherlands and Sweden. Plant associations. Orchidaceae, Cypripedioideae: Cypripedium curtisii, C. lawrenceanum, Paphiopedilum sp. – Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae: Acanthephippium mantinianum, Aerides crassifolium, Angraecum sp., Arachnis sp., Aranthera sp., Bulbophyllum leopardianum, B. mandibulare, Catasetum splendens [Neotropical!], Cattleya sp., Coelogyne asperata, C. pandurata, C. xyrekes, Cymbidium sp., Dendrobium chameleon, D. canaliculatum, D. compactum, D. crassinode, D. crystallinum, D. findleyanum, D. guerreroi, D. phalaenopsis, D. pierardii, D. spectabile, D. superbum, D. taurinum, D. victoria-reginae, Epidendrum sp., Grammatophyllum multiflorum, G. speciosum, Liparis condylobulbon, Myrmecophila tibicinis, Oncidium sphacelatum, Phalaenopsis amabilis, P. rimestadiana, P. sanderiana, P. schilleriana, Renanthera alba, Rhynchostylis retusa, Saccolabium sp., Spathoglottis intermedia, Stauropsis lissochiloides, Trichoglottis brachiata, Vanda luzonica, Va nd a x Miss Joaquim. – Bromeliaceae. Guzmania sp. [USDA interception from Netherlands Antilles; plant association probably accidental]. Records. American Samoa: Tutuila Island, Malaeimi, 2002 (USNM, 1, Schmaedick 2002). Australia: Adelaide, botanical garden, 1904 (SAM, 1); Cairns, 1949, 1965 (ANIC); Townsville, 1948 (ANIC); Darwin, 1982, interception, origin Singapore (ANIC); Gove Peninsula, 1982, ex orchids from Queensland (ANIC); Howard Springs, 1987, ex orchid (ANIC); Adelaide, 1987, interception, origin Singapore (ANIC); Port Adelaide, 1988, interception, origin Singapore (ANIC). Canada: Montreal, 1968, ex orchid from Hawaii (CMNC, 1); Halifax, 1984 (Majka et al. 2007). Germany: Munich, 2002, botanical garden (A. Riedel, pers. comm.). Indonesia: Batavia [Jakarta], 1933 (BMNH, 1); Java (BMNH, 1). Japan: interceptions since 1958 (Morimoto 1994). Malaysia: Tohore [Tohor?], 1929 (BMNH, 2); Penang, 1913, 1916 (BMNH, 2); Kuching, 1964 (BMNH, 2). New Caledonia: Noumea, 1976, ex orchid (ANIC). Philippines: Manila, 1914 (USNM, 2), prior 1942 (SNSD, 3); Santo Tomas, Batangas, 1997 (BMNH, 6). Singapore: 1895 (1), 1896 (1), 1902 (16), 1909 (2), 1922 (10), without date (10) (BMNH, 40). “ Straits Settlements ”: 1897 (BMNH, 1). Thailand: Bangkok, 1938 (BMNH, 3). United States: Bound Brook, NJ, greenhouse (AMNH, 1); New York, 1996, interception, origin Indonesia (USNM, 1); Washington, DC, greenhouse, 1906, origin Philippines (USNM, 3), ditto, 1926, origin Singapore (USNM, 1), 1936, interception, origin Philippines (USNM, 1); San Francisco, CA, 1915, 1938 (2), interceptions, origin Philippines (USNM, 3); 1936 (4), 2007, origin Singapore (USNM, 5); Miami, FL, 2005, interception, origin Netherlands Antilles (USNM, 1); Hawaii, since 1910, interceptions and in nursery, origin Straits Settlements and Philippines (USNM, 53). Notes. This is the most frequently intercepted and noxious species of Orchidophilus, but has been lumped variously with O. epidendri. Apart from rather sporadic occurrences in numerous major cities, O. aterrimus now has extended its range in the Indo-Pacific region from secondary dispersal with traded orchid cultivars. The number of interceptions has been scanty in Europe and North America for decades but increased recently in other regions that have not been confronted with this problem before. More recent developments are Neotropical records and associations with New World orchids. To accomplish stability in this difficult complex of orchid weevils, I here designate a male specimen as lectotype of O. aterrimus, with the data given above. Orchidophilus eburifer (Pascoe), comb. n. Baris eburifera Pascoe, 1887: 359. Holotype male, labelled “Holo-/ type ”, “ India?”, “ Baris / eburifera / typus Pascoe”, “Pascoe Coll./ B.M. 1893-60.”, “ Baris / eburifera Pasc. ” (BMNH). Hustache (1938), Morimoto (1994). Acythopeus gilvonotatus Barber, 1917: 17. Holotype female, labelled “Washington/ Nov. 16, 0 6 DC”, “Executive/ Greenhouses”, “on orchids/ from Philip-/ pine Islands”, “ Acythopeus / gilvonotatus / Barber/ Type no. 21067 USNM” (USNM). Paratypes: 2 males, labelled “on Orchids frm./ Philippin. Islds./ Nov. 16, 1906 ”, “in Executive/ Greenhouse/ Wash. DC.”, “ Paratype / No. 21067/ U.S. N.M.”, “ɗ”, “ Baris / eburifera / Pascoe/ det. R. T. Thompson 1973/ comp. with type ” (USNM); “on greenhouse/ Phalaenopsis ”, “Bergen Co/ NJ”, “rec[eive]d. 1916 from H. B. Weiss Coll.”, “ Paratype / No. 21067/ U.S. N.M.”, “WEISS”, “ɗ” (USNM). syn. n. Orchidophilus gilvonotatus. Buchanan (1935), Hustache (1938), Swezey (1945), Pritchard (1959), Voss (1961), O’Brien & Wibmer (1982), Morimoto (1994), Hirao et al. (2001). Distribution. Native to the Philippines; adventive but not established in Great Britain and the United States (including Hawaii). Plant associations. Orchidaceae, Epidendroideae: Aerides lawrenceae, Phalaenopsis amabilis, P. s c h i l l e - riana, P. stuartiana, Vanda teres (ex stalks). Records. Great Britain: England, greenhouse (BMNH, 1), specimens with undocumented origin, ex Vanda sp. (BMNH, 6). Philippines: Hirao et al. (2001). United States: Bergen Co., NJ, 1916, greenhouse (USNM, 1 PT), Bound Brook, NJ, greenhouse (AMNH, 1); Washington, DC, 1906, greenhouse (USNM, HT + 1 PT), 1923, interceptions, origin Philippines (USNM, 3); Hawaii, 1916, greenhouse (BPBM, 1), 1930, 1932, interceptions, origin Philippines (USNM, 2), 1933, interception (BPBM, 1). “ Dutch East Indies ”: (BMNH, 1). Notes. Pascoe (1887) and Barber (1917) provided detailed descriptions and referred explicitly to orchids as the larval host. Nevertheless, the identity of Baris eburifera as an Orchidophilus and its synonymy with O. gilvonotatus went unnoticed until 1973, when Richard Thompson, London, compared type material of the two species and indicated the synonymy on his label. Orchidophilus eburifer has been dispersed occasionally with traded orchids but so far has not become established inside or outside greenhouses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBiological and pharmacological studies of plantsFrench-language works237,207