MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6893998077 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6182135

Pertsovius heterodentatus Andronov & Kosobokova, 2011, n. gen.

2011· article· en· W6893998077 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIchthyology and Marine Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaSomiteArthropod mouthpartsAppendageDorsumAnterior surfaceSpermatheca

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pertsovius heterodentatus n. gen. et sp. nov. (Figures 5–6) Material examined. Holotype: adult female, dissected, body length 0.70 mm. ZIN accession number 91098. Collected during the USCGC “ Healy ” Ocean Exploration-05/2 cruise, station 5, Canada Basin (73° 24’N, 153° 33’W), 5 July 2005, bottom depth 3850 m, depth of collection 3000– 2000 m. Paratype: adult female, dissected, body length 0.70 mm. ZIN accession number 91099. Collected during the USCGC “ Healy ” Ocean Exploration-05/2 cruise, station 5, Canada Basin (73° 24’N, 153° 33’W), 5 July 2005, bottom depth 3850 m, depth of collection 2000– 1000 m. Species description. Prosome ovoid in dorsal view (Fig. 5: 1), nearly three times as long as urosome and 1.9 times as long as wide. The first pediger partly separate from cephalosome (Fig. 5: 2), while fourth and fifth pedigers fused. Genital complex slightly asymmetrical (Fig. 5: 3) with lateral borders strongly convex, and large spermathecae obvious. Genital double somite approximately equal in length to subsequent two somites combined: anterior part strongly protruding ventrally forming a thick wide fold covering middle part of double somite (Fig. 5: 5). Anal somite nearly twice as long as preceding somite. Antennule of 24 free segments, reaching about to posterior border of caudal rami (Fig. 5: 2). Mouthparts as in P. tridentatus. No substantial differences from appendages of other species in the genus noted, except for maxilliped syncoxa lobe one having one seta (Fig. 5: 5, 6). Р1-Р4 (Fig. 6: 1–5) of typical structure for genus: endopods one-segmented, exopods three-segmented. Outer distal spine on first segment of P1 exopod long, almost reaching middle of outer border of third segment. Outer distal spine of first exopodal segment of Р2 extending beyond distal end of second segment. Outer bor- der edge of third exopodal segment of left Р2 armed with three spines, but right Р2 with only two spines, both in holotype (Fig. 6: 2) and in paratype (Fig. 6: 3). Differential diagnosis. The presence of three outer spines on the third exopodal segment of the left Р2 and only two spines on the right Р2 is characteristic only for this species. The appearance of the genital field, specifically the protruding thick wide fold that covers the middle part of the double somite (Fig. 5: 3 and 4) serves as an additional diagnostic character for the females of this species. Etymology. The specific name refers to the number of external spines on the distal segment of left (three spines) and right (two spines) exopods of P2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicIchthyology and Marine Biology→French-language works237,207→