Ooctonus hemipterus Haliday 1833
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ooctonus hemipterus Haliday, 1833 (Figs 5–8) Ooctonus hemipterus Haliday 1833: 344. Taxonomic history and synonyms summarized in Triapitsyn (2010: 15, 18) and Huber (2012: 37). Material examined. CHINA. XINJIANG: Urumqi, 25.viii.2001, W. Cui (Cui Weidong), sweeping [3 ♂, ICXU]. Distribution. China (new record) (Xinjiang). This species is widespread in the Holarctic region, from Ireland east to China, currently known from almost half of the 44 European countries, including the European part of Russia; it was previously recorded from Kyrgyzstan (Triapitsyn 2010), which is adjacent to Xinjiang, China. Elsewhere, O. hemipterus is recorded from Morocco, Turkey, Canada, and the USA (Triapitsyn 2010; Huber 2012). Hosts. Unknown. Comments. Some females of O. hemipterus are brachypterous, while males are always macropterous. This species may be collected in late autumn or even in December, which lead Huber (2012) to suggest that it might overwinter as adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".