MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894022338 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6038113

Signiphora ensifera Woolley & Dal Molin 2017, n. sp.

2017· article· en· W6894022338 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvipositorPedicelScapeForamenSetaWingClearance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signiphora ensifera Woolley & Dal Molin, n. sp. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8F5F342F-1471-447F-B832-56AC359DBEB9 Figures 153–164 Diagnosis. Ovipositor and ovipositor sheaths very long, exerted approximately 1/3× length of the metasoma, fore wing with a discal seta, pedicel long relative to scape and clava, medial sclerite of the propodeum yellow, contrasting with the brown lateral sclerites, and Mt8 transverse and thick. Signiphora ensifera is most similar to S. renuncula as both species share a discal seta in the fore wing and elongate ovipositors, but it can be distinguished from S. renuncula by the transversely striate sculpture on the vertex (minutely reticulate in S. renuncula); a bilobed Mt1 with medial portion rounded (bilobed with medial portion transverse in S. renuncula); and Mt8 lacking medial incision (rounded medial incision in S. renuncula). Description. Female. Length, anterior margin of pronotum to epiproct apex, 0.57–0.74 mm (n=3). Coloration based on specimens cleared and mounted in Canada balsam. Head pale yellow with pale brown on occiput, scape pale tan, remainder of antenna uniformly tan or light brown. Medial 1/3 of pronotum and anterior 1/3 of mesonotum brown, remainder of mesosoma and medial propodeal sclerite pale yellow, lateral sclerites of propodeum and entire metasoma, including ovipositor sheaths, brown. Fore wing infuscated from base to apex of stigma vein, two hyaline areas under submarginal vein, infuscation even under marginal vein. Head. Vertex and frons very finely and transversely imbricate, with a few scattered punctations. Mandible with two teeth, mandibular ducts enlarged apically. Pedicel length:scape length 0.80–0.86; 3 anelli, second anellus 2.0– 2.5× the length of first, third anellus 2.5–3.5× the length of first; clava length:scape length 0.74–1.83. Mesosoma. Pronotum, mesonotum, scutellum and medial sclerite of propodeum finely and transversely imbricate. Scutellum with 4 setae and 2 campaniform sensilla; medial propodeal sclerite rounded, process on medial sclerite narrowly rounded. Fore wing with discal seta, length:width 3.4–3.5; fore wing LMS:width 2.5–2.6; marginal vein:stigmal vein 2.8; marginal vein with 6 dorsal and 0–2 ventral setae; seta M3 length:marginal vein length 0.48–0.65, apical end of costal cell at seta M2 or between seta M2 and M3. Hind wing margins subparallel, hind wing length:width 7.0–7.7; hind wing width:fore wing width 0.45–0.48; hind wing LMS:hind wing width 2.5–2.6. Mesofemur with one long and one short spine on posteroapical margin, mesotibial spur with 6–7 teeth, mesotibial spur:basitarsus 0.91–1.0, basitarsus:mesotibia 0.71–0.74. Metasoma. Mt1 bilobed with medial portion rounded or almost transverse, length Mt1:length Mt2 1.0–3.0; anterior-most portion of ovipositor lying under propodeum or Mt1; ovipositor length:metasoma length 1.2–1.3; ovipositor sheaths:ovipositor 0.32–0.38; Ms3–Ms6 with anterior projections medium to long; Ms6 at midpoint or between midpoint and ¾ length metasoma and with 6 long setae, Mt8 with anterodorsal margin absolutely transverse, Mt8 relatively wide. Male. Unknown. Discussion. Four female specimens from St. Vincent, W.I. reared by F. Bennett from an unidentified scale (BMNH(E) 990323) may belong to this species as the ovipositor is fully the length of the metasoma, but the ovipositor sheaths are not as elongate and exerted as in the type series. The specimens are in poor condition and many of the other diagnostic features cannot be observed. Type material. HOLOTYPE ♀: mounted in balsam (BMNH (E) 990243); Brazil, Nova Teutonia, 18.v.1943, F. Plaumann, B.M. 1957-341. Deposited in BMNH. PARATYPES: two ♀, same data as holotype except 19.xii.1943 and 19.v.1943, BMNH (E) 990244 and BMNH (E) 990245. Paratypes deposited in BMNH and TAMU, with permission of BMNH(E). Biology is unknown for this species. Etymology. From Latin ensifer = sword, referring to the long ovipositor characteristic of this species. The species name is an adjective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207