Drymeia quadrisetosa Malloch 1919
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drymeia quadrisetosa (Malloch, 1919) Figs. 16 A–F Pogonomyia quadrisetosa Malloch, 1919: 77. Pogonomyia amurensis Lavčiev, 1971: 220. Syn. nov. Drymeia amurensis; Pont, 1986: 71. Note. Lavčiev (1971) described Pogonomyia amurensis from Klimoutsky and Samodon in Khabarovskiy Kray, Russia. The holotype of D. amurensis should be in the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg, Russia, but it was not found there by Pont (2004) or by VSS. We have not seen the type, but Lavčiev’s description of D. amurensis and his figures of the hypopygium and mid femur are the same as for D. quadrisetosa Malloch, except for the number of strong anteroventral setae at the apex of mid femur. The mid femur of D. amurensis has only one such seta (Lavčiev 1971), but the mid femur of D. quadrisetosa is said to have two such setae. However, many of the specimens of D. quadrisetosa which we have studied have a variable number of these setae, from 1 to 3, which may be the same or different on each mid leg. So the number of strong setae is a variable character and we have no hesitation in proposing this synonymy. Material examined. RUSSIA: Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, Chaunskii raion: 1 male, Pevek, 28.vi.1963, K. Gorodkov; Anadyrskii raion, 3 males and 4 females, low part of Anadyr’ River, 64.83ºN 175.96ºE, 18.vii.2013, A. Barkalov. Krasnoyarsky Krai, Taymyr Peninsula: 2 males and 1 female, 114 km Khatanga, Kotuy River, 71.4ºN 103ºЕ, 1–5.vii.2010, A. Barkalov. Altai Republic, Kosh-Agachskii raion: 2 males, Ukok plateau, environs of Kal’dzhin-Kul’-Bas lake, 2400 m, 49°19'N 87°26'E, 21.vii.2006, T. Novgorodova. Zabaykalsky Krai [Chitinskaya Oblast]: 1 male, Nature Reserve “Sokhondinskii”, Verkhnii Bukukun cordon, ~ 1540 m, 49º36'N 111º06'E, 6.viii.1991, V. Pekin. Sakha Republic: 1 male, ~ 100 km NW Oymyakon, 64°08'N 141°27'E, [as 364 km from on road Khangyga], 5.vii.1985, A. Barkalov. Remark. There has been no description of this species since Malloch’s (1919) original description, but the species can be reliably identified with the key by Huckett (1965a). Distribution. Alaska, northern Canada (Yukon, Northwest Territories, Manitoba, Quebec, Labrador) and Russia (Siberia).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".