Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dolerus incisus Goulet, 1986 Fig. 20A-C Notes. Finland: Regio kuusamoensis, Kuusamo Siikauopaja, YKJ grid coordinates: 7362:3612 [66.334°N, 29.511°E], 2&female; (ZMUO.035155, ZMUO.035156), 12.06.2018. 1&female; (ZMUO.045265), 20.06.2020. All specimens leg. M. Mutanen. ZMUO. First record in the Palaearctic. Recorded previously only in boreal North America: Alaska, Alberta, Yukon, and North West Territories (Goulet 1986). The genetic and morphological affinity of <i>D. incisus</i> to <i>D. junci</i> and <i>D. yukonensis</i> suggests that the host plant of <i>D. incisus</i> is also a species of <i>Equisetum</i> (Goulet 1986). The habitat in Finland is a shallow oxbow lake (meander) of the Oulanka river with plenty of <i>Equisetum fluviatile</i>, which is also the host of <i>D. junci</i>. This habitat matches perfectly with that given for <i>D. incisus</i> in North America by Goulet (1986). Several other <i>Dolerus</i> species occur syntopically, including the closely related <i>D. junci</i> Stephens (= <i>D. cothurnatus</i> auct., see above). The melanic form of <i>D. incisus</i> is recorded from Finland (all three are females, see above, Fig. 20A) and Norway (Heimdalsmunnen, alt 1150 m, leg. E. Heibo, CEH). Melanic females of <i>D. subarcticus</i> (recorded from Norway and Kamtschatka, see under <i>D. subarcticus</i>) can be distinguished by their postocellar furrows, the sawsheath (valvula 3) shape, and its apical setation (Fig. 20B). Melanic males can be separated most reliably by their penis valves (Fig. 20C, 20D). Only the melanic colour form of <i>D. incisus</i> has so far been recognized from Fennoscandian countries, whereas in Canada and the USA both the black color form and a form with red-banded abdomen and partly reddish legs are known. We studied paratypes of <i>D. incisus</i>: 2&female;, 2&male;, some of them dissected, CNC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.044 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".