MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894035149 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6501652

Anthobiomorphus alesi Shavrin 2022, sp. n.

2022· article· en· W6894035149 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApex (geometry)AedeagusBase (topology)Head (geology)SternumTransverse plane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anthobiomorphus alesi sp. n. (Figs. 1–4) Type material examined: Holotype m# [left apical antennomere missing; a plastic plate with aedeagus in Canada balsam was pinned under the card with the beetle; abdominal tergite VIII, sternite VIII, and the apical segment are glued to the same card under the specimen]: ‘E. NEPAL: KOSI | Val. Induwa Kola | 2000 m, 14.IV.[19]84 | [I.] Löbl – [A.] Smetana’ , ‘HOLOTYPE | Anthobiomorphus | alesi sp. n. | Shavrin A.V. des. 2022’ (MHNG). Description. Measurements: length of head (from base of labrum to neck constriction along head midline): 0.35; maximum width of head including eyes: 0.69; length of antenna: 1.68; ocular length (longitudinal): 0.20; length of pronotum: 0.62; maximum width of pronotum: 1.02; sutural length of elytra (length of elytra from apex of scutellum to posterior margin of sutural angle): 1.60; maximum width of elytra: 1.36; maximum width of abdomen: 1.00; length of metatibia (holotype): 0.85; length of metatarsus (holotype): 0.31 (combined length of metatarsomeres 1–4: 0.16; length of metatarsomere 5: 0.15); length of aedeagus (from base of the median lobe to apex of parameres): 0.50; total length (from anterior margin of clypeus to apex of abdomen): 3.20. Habitus as in Fig. 1. Body and antennomeres 3–11 brown (head slightly darker); mouthparts, antennomeres 1–2, lateral portions of pronotum and legs yellow. Forebody without microsculpture except for clypeus with indistinct, fine, transverse microreticulation and neck with fine isodiametric meshes; abdomen with indistinct transverse microsculpture. Head transverse, about twice as broad as long; middle portion slightly elevated; latero-apical impressions narrow and moderately deep; anteocellar foveae (grooves in front of ocelli) deep and moderately long, somewhat parallel-sided, reaching level of middle length of strongly convex eyes; anterior portion between antennal insertion and anterior margin of eye distinctly concave. Punctation very sparse and irregular, finer in middle, denser, and larger and deeper on infraorbital ridges. Ocelli situated at level of postocular ridges, distance between ocelli about twice the distance between ocellus and posterior margin of eye. Maxilla as in Fig. 2; apical maxillary palpomere distinctly more than twice as long as penultimate palpomere; galea divided into two narrow lobes. Antennae reaching apical third of elytra when reclined; basal antennomere long, more than three times as long as broad, antennomere 2 distinctly narrower and shorter than basal antennomere, 3 slightly longer than 2, 4–7 slightly broader than 3, 8 slightly shorter than 7, 9–10 slightly shorter and broader than 8, apical antennomere about 1.3 times as long as preapical antennomere, from apical third gradually narrowed toward subacute apex. Pronotum convex in middle, 1.6 times as broad as long, 1.4 times as broad as head, from about middle more narrowed posteriad than anteriad toward subacute anterior angles; apical angles widely rounded, slightly protruded anteriad; apical margin widely rounded, about as broad as rounded posterior margin; lateral edges with irregular crenulation, with two distinct protrusions anterior to sharply narrowed laterobasal margins; middle portion convex, with wide and deep semicircular impression in mediobasal third. Punctation irregular, large and deep, moderately dense, with wide impunctate portion in mediobasal third. Visible part of scutellum without punctures. Elytra 1.6 times as long as broad, distinctly broadened posteriad, reaching apical margin of abdominal tergite V, with widely rounded apical marings. Punctation larger and deeper than that in pronotum, denser and finer on parascutellar area and along suture, on each elytron forming six very vague and tangled longitudinal rows of punctures. Hind wings fully developed. Abdomen distinctly narrower than elytra, with a pair of small and oval tomentose wing-folding patches in middle of tergite V, with narrow palisade fringe on inner margin of abdominal tergite VII. Male. Apical margins of abdominal tergite VIII and sternite VIII slightly sinuate. Aedeagus with wide median lobe, gradually narrowed toward wide, rounded apex; parameres long, significantly exceeding apex of median lobe, distinctly narrowed in apical portions, with two apical and two preapical setae; internal sac moderately narrow and short (Fig. 3). Lateral aspect of aedeagus as in Fig. 4. Female unknown. Comparative notes. Based on the length of the body, elongate antennomeres, and the shape of latero-apical parts of the pronotum, distinctly protruded anteriad, A. alesi sp.n. is similar to A. makranczyi Shavrin & Smetana, 2020. From this species it can be distinguished by the paler body, different shape of the galea, longer elytra, and longer parameres, with narrower apical portions. Distribution. The species is at present known only from the type locality in Nepal. Bionomics. Specimen was collected at elevation 2000 m a.s.l. The detailed ecological data are unknown. Etymology. Patronymic, the new species is named after Aleš Smetana† (1931-2021), one of the collectors of the holotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207