Pseudozygomma maculipennis Skuse 1890, comb. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pseudozygomma maculipennis (Skuse, 1890) comb. n. (Fig. 26 A‒G) Zygoneura maculipennis Skuse, 1890 [Skuse (1890): 411 ‒412]. Type locality. Australia, New South Wales, Hogan´s Brush, Narara Creek, near Gosford. Lectotype (here designated): Male. Slide bears original label data verbatim ‘ Zygoneura maculipennis / Ƌ (ink) TYPE./ F. A. A. Skuse’ (print), ‘Hogan’s Brush/ Narara. Sk./ August.’ (ink). Mounted in Canada balsam Dec. 2015. (ANIC; Slide No. 053-1). Paralectotypes. 1 male, same data (PWMP; Slide No. 053-3); 1 female: original label data verbatim ‘ Zygoneura maculipennis / ♀ (ink) TYPE./ F. A. A. Skuse’ (print), ‘Sydney’ (ink) (not studied). Preservation. All morphological details in good condition; thorax of paralectotype damaged. Remarks. Original description states “ Hab.—Sydney, and Hogan’s Brush, Narara Creek, near Gosford, N.S.W. (Skuse). Five specimens in August.” Further material: 2 males, 17.‒24.XII.1993, NSW, Candelo near Bega, yellow trap, leg. A. Kallis (PWMP). Additional description. Male. Head. Dark brown. Eye bridge 3 facets wide; flagellomeres brown, necks rather long, brown; 4th flagellomere with l/w index of 2.6, hairs very dense and somewhat longer than the width of the basal node; palpus 3-segmented, yellow, basal segment without sensory pit, with 2 bristles, last segment long. Thorax. Dark brown, scutum with short hairs (prescutellar and lateral hairs not more robust); scutellum with 2 longer marginal bristles; mediotergite with a few fine hyaline bristles in the middle; postpronotum bare. Wing pale, weak fuscous patch around the base of the M-fork; R1 = 2/3 R; R5 with ventral macrotrichia in the distal half; y = x, without macrotrichia; M-stem weakly visible, with 1‒3 macrotrichia; M-fork vase-like, with strongly arched M1; M-branches and 2/3 of CuA1 with macrotrichia, the strongly curved CuA2 with single macrotrichia only. Haltere short, brown. Coxae yellow, legs yellowish-brown, femora of hind legs brown in the distal half; fore tibia with a few spine-like bristles within the ground hair; apex of fore tibia with a broad comb of hyaline bristles, semicircular bordered; spurs of middle and hind tibia equal in size, longer than the width of the tibia apex; claws without teeth. Abdomen. Brown, densely hairy, rather long and dark. Hypopygium with broad v-shaped ventral base, without lobe or patch of bristles, but with hairs somewhat longer than gonocoxite on the inner ventral margin; gonostylus elongate, without apical tooth, apically as well as in the distal half of the inner side covered densely with short bristles and fine bristle-like spines (5‒6 spines somewhat longer than hairs near the middle of the inner side); tegmen deformed, with fine teeth; aedeagus rather short and thin. Body length: 3.2 mm. Comments. This species is characterized by a vase-like M-fork, macrotrichia on M-branches and CuA1, a 3- segmented palpus without a sensory pit, brown coloured distal half of hind femora, a slightly semicircular bordered comb of bristles on the apex of the fore tibia and claws without teeth. The species belongs to the genus Pseudozygomma Mohrig, known from Papua New Guinea. In the shape of the gonostylus it is similar to Pseudoz. flavoabdominalis Mohrig, 2004. Distribution. Australia (New South Wales).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".