Rhogeessa gracilis G. S. Miller 1897
Bibliographic record
Abstract
217. Slender Yellow Bat Rhogeessa gracilis French: Rhogeessa gracile / German: Schlanke Gelbfledermaus / Spanish: Rogesa gracil Taxonomy. Rhogeessa gracilis G. S. Miller, 1897, “Piaxtla, Puebla,” Mexico. See R. alleni. Monotypic. Distribution. W & S Mexico (Zacatecas and Jalisco to Oaxaca). Descriptive notes. Head-body c.46 48 mm, tail 36-43 mm, ear 17- 5-18 mm, hindfoot 6-7 mm, forearm 32-7-33- 5 mm; weight 3-4 g. Dorsal fur is tricolored, with grayish-brown bases, pale-buff centers, and light ocherous-buff tips; ventral fur bicolored, with dark grayish-brown bases and pinkish-butfftips. Ears long and broad, differentiating it from congeners; tragus slender, tapering to a point. Wing membranes thin, semi-transparent, and sparsely furred on side of body; uropatagium sparsely furred until knee; calcar slightly shorter than free margin of uropatagium. Skull narrow with steep slope on forehead; braincase moderately inflated; sagittal and occipital crests present but poorly developed. I, nearly as large as I; lingual surface of cingulum of C' is smooth and regular. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 30. Habitat. Coniferous forests, and less frequently xeric shrubland and deciduous rainforests. Bats were captured in pine and pine-oak forests, arid areas, and very arid tropical forests; also, over a mountain stream in pine-oak forest and one over an arroyo in an oak forest. Altitudinal range is 600-2000 m, with most records from above 1000 m. Food and Feeding. Insectivorous. Breeding. A pregnant female was captured in May, and subadult females in July. Activity patterns. No information. Movements, Home range and Social organization. No information. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Widely distributed, but considered rare. Bibliography. Arroyo-Cabrales & Baker (2014d), Baird et al. (2008, 2009), Jones, J.K. (1977), LaVal (1973a), Miller (1897), Simmons (2005), Solari (2019h), Watkins et al. (1972).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".