Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key of species of Phidon Rehn, 1933 (males) The key of Rehn 1933 is here updated for males. P. dubius males are unknown (Princis 1952). Thus, this species is not included in this key. 1. Brachypterous................................................................... Phidon chanco Vera, 2019 - Wings well-developed................................................................................. 2 2. Tegmina with Sc vein fused at base with radial.............................................................. 3 - Tegmina with Sc vein not fused at base with radial........................................................... 4 3. Tegmina surpassing apex of abdomen by less than pronotal length; 7 unforked radials; pronotal disk with pigmentation disposed in two lateral bands and spots; total body length less than 10 mm......................... Phidon bullocki Rehn, 1933 - Tegmina surpassing apex of abdomen by more than pronotal length; 8–9 unforked radials; pronotal disk with central drawing as an inverted trident shape crowned by three spots, the central elongated, total body length between 15.5–20 mm......................................................................................... Phidon abismus sp. nov. 4. Pronotum symmetrically trapezoidal in outline; disk of same with pattern of dark punctulae, not broadly maculate laterad. Tegmina with discoidal sectors less definitely phylliform in character or branching; all terminal veins or rami with numerous raised and infuscate points...................................................... Phidon araucanus Rehn, 1933 - Pronotum transverse elliptical in outline; disk of same with dark punctulae and laterad also broadly maculate. Tegmina with discoidal sectors distinctly phylliform in character and bifurcation; tegminal veins and rami without raised infuscate points......................................................................... Phidon reticularis Blanchard, 1851
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.077 | 0.026 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".