Bibliographic record
Abstract
12. Prostoia similis (Hagen, 1861) Longhorn Forestfly http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Plecoptera.speciesfile.org:TaxonName:6094 (Figs. 85‒94) Taeniopteryx similis Hagen 1861:34. Holotype male (United States National Museum), Washington D.C., USA Nemoura similis: Banks, 1907:14 Nemoura divergens: Claassen, 1923:282. Syn. Ricker, 1952:49 Nemoura divergens: Needham & Claassen, 1925:203 Nemoura similis: Needham & Claassen, 1925:214 Nemoura divergens: Claassen, 1940:54 Nemoura similis: Claassen, 1940:63 Nemoura (Prostoia) similis: Ricker, 1952:49 Prostoia similis: Illies, 1966:221 Nemoura (Prostoia) similis: Harper & Hynes, 1971:1138 Prostoia similis: Zwick, 1973:346 Nemoura (Prostoia) similis: Hitchcock, 1974:105 Prostoia similis: Poulton & Stewart, 1991:30 Prostoia similis: Grubbs et al., 2014:25 Prostoia similis: Stark, 2017:214 Distribution. Canada: ON, PQ. USA: CT, DE, IL, IN, KY, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, NY, OH, PA, SC, TN, VA, WI, WV (DeWalt et al. 2022) Male. Macropterous. Body length 3.8–5.7 mm, forewing length 5.4–6.1 mm (n = 9). Gills absent. Cerci simple and unmodified (Figs. 85–86). Paraprocts with lightly sclerotized, undivided lobes. Epiproct ventral sclerite sclerotized throughout length, narrow in both dorsal and lateral profiles, and fully recurved over abdomen (Figs. 85–88), base narrow and gradually widening for ca. ⅔ of length (Figs. 85–86), tip scarcely deflected upward and tapered apically (Figs. 89–90); dorsal sclerite reduced and restricted to lateral arms in basal area, which are narrow and sinuous (Figs. 85–86, 91–92). Female. Macropterous. Body length 4.6–7.4 mm, forewing length 6.4–7.8 mm (n = 13). The 7 th and 8 th sterna fused medially (Fig. 93); the 8 th sternum is modified slightly as a subgenital plate, with a medial excavation and distinct posterolateral corners (Figs. 93‒94). Larva. Described by Harper & Hynes (1971) with an additional partial illustration of the cercus in Stark (2017). Comments. Prostoia similis is distributed in the eastern US and southern Canada south to Tennessee with few records from west of the Mississippi River (Grubbs et al. 2014, DeWalt et al. 2022).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".