Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sublettea coffmani (Roback, 1975) Pupa (n=2). Figs. 3 a-e. Description. Thoracic horn with long apical filaments (Fig. 3a). Robust patches of spines present on segments II-V (Fig. 3b), spine patches on segment IV and V with longer lateral spines (Fig. 3c). Paired spine patches are located in the anterior corners of the ventral intersegmental membrane of sternite VIII. (Fig. 3d). Anal lobe and genital sac as in Fig. 3e; anal lobe with robust patches of spines and long setae (Fig. 3e). Notes. A detailed description of this species is given by Roback (1975). This is the only species of Sublettea described from the Nearctic. Study sites. Lynde Creek, Whitby, Ontario; 43° 54’ 42.27” N 78° 57’ 52.4” W. Ecology and habitats. Larvae of Sublettea inhabit lotic habitats with a preference for cool, clear and fast flowing streams (Ashe and O’Connor 1994). Larvae of S. coffmani construct soft, non-transportable cases of fine sediments, which they attach to stream substrates (Roback 1975). Nearctic distribution: Canada (New Brunswick, 1 st record Ontario); USA (Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".