MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894093917 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8319494

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) eremum Gardner & Gibbs 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6894093917 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumMargin (machine learning)Posterior wallLadinian

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) eremum sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 76F04F95-0D86-42FF-A596-C7415D9BB1FF Figs 21–23, 94B Diagnosis Females of L. eremum sp. nov. have the tegula relatively small (exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view by about a seta’s breadth if at all), with inner posterior margin straight or very weakly concave, and usually moderately sparsely punctate laterally at midlength (IS = 1–2 PD); metapostnotum rugose due to very strong anastomosing rugae reaching posterior margin; postgena smooth, at most weakly lineolate; mesoscutum and mesepisternum mostly shiny (mesoscutum becoming tessellate anteromedially and mesepisternum sometimes dull dorsally); T1 anterior slope coriarious; and apical rims of T1–T2 distinctly punctate with punctation similar to discs (sometimes slightly sparser). Females of L. eremum sp. nov. are most similar to those of L. diabolicum sp. nov., L. ellisiae, L. gaudiale, and L. helianthi. Females of L. diabolicum and L. ellisiae have the postgena lineate and apical rims of T1–T2 impunctate or with minute, sparse, obscure punctures. Females of L. gaudiale have the tegula inner posterior margin more strongly concave and often more densely punctate laterally at midlength (IS <1 PD); T1 anterior slope very shiny; metapostnotum rugae usually not reaching posterior margin; and postgena sometimes lineate. Females of L. helianthi have the mesoscutum entirely tessellate and postgena lineate. Males of L. eremum sp. nov. have the tegula relatively small (reaching but not exceeding posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view), with inner posterior margin weakly concave, and entirely covered in deep, crowded punctures (IS = 0 PD) except with some narrow interspaces <1 PD laterally at midlength; metapostnotum rugose and propodeum lateral surface extensively rugulose due to very strong anastomosing rugae reaching posterior margin; face with sparse tomentum restricted to paraocular area; mesepisternum with crowded punctures (IS = 0 PD); and metasomal terga with depressed apical rims impunctate. Males of L. eremum sp. nov. are most similar to those of L. holzenthali sp. nov. and members of the L. stictaspis species complex. Males of L. holzenthali have the clypeus and supraclypeal area with sparse tomentum; tegula more sparsely punctate with more distinct interspaces (IS ≥0.5 PD); metapostnotum with subparallel rugae and propodeum lateral surface smooth and shiny; and metasomal terga with depressed apical rims punctate. Males in the L. stictaspis species complex have the face uniformly covered in dense tomentum below the eye emargination and mesepisternum usually more sparsely punctate with distinct interspaces (IS ≥ 0.5 PD). Etymology The specific epithet ʻ eremum ʼ is the Latinized Greek adjective ʻ eremos ʼ (lonely). It refers to the fact that this species is primarily known from singleton specimens in remote locations. Material examined Holotype UNITED STATES – Utah • ♀; Washington Co., 0.63 mi. NNW of Lemmon Spring; 37.2953° N, 112.9092° W; 16 Jun. 2006; F. Nicklen, B. Hays leg.; ex Apocynum androsaemifolium; BBSL ZION23556. [Verbatim label: USA UT Washington Co. / 0.63 mi NNW Lemmon Spr. 12S E330774 N4129346 16Jun06 / F.Nicklen, B.Hays / Apocynum androsaemifolium / ZION 23556 // 2388C04 // HOLOTYPE / Lasioglossum (Dialictus) eremum Gardner and Gibbs] Paratypes UNITED STATES – Arizona • 1 ♀; Coconino Co.; 35.35393° N, 111.73061° W; 19 Jun. 2012; Dave Smith leg.; NAUF4 A 0087470 • 3 ♀♀; Carrizo Creek; [33.9° N, 110.28° W]; 16 Jun. 1950; R. H. Beamer leg.; SEMC • 34 ♀♀; ibid.; 16 Jun. 1950; R. H. Beamer leg.; ex Euphorbia albomarginata; SEMC • 1 ♂; Chiricahua Mountains, Southwestern Research Station; [31.883° N, 109.205° W]; elev. 1646 m; 19 Aug. 1964; Charles D. Michener leg.; ex Heterotheca subaxillaris; SEMC • 1 ♀; Flagstaff; [35.2° N, 111.65° W]; 14 Jul. 1947; L.D. Beamer leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀, 1 ♂; Huachuca; [31.5° N, 110.4° W]; 1937; W. Benedict leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; Santa Rita Mountains; [31.7° N, 110.8° W]; elev. 1524–2438 m; July; F.H. Snow leg.; SEMC. – Nevada • 1 ♀; Clark Co., Lovell Canyon; 36.1648° N, 115.5758° W; 20 May 2005; E. Ahlstrom leg.; BBSL640067 • 1 ♀; Ely; [39.25° N, 114.87° W]; 30 Jun. 1950; C.D. Michener leg.; ex Melilotus officinalis; SEMC. – New Mexico • 1 ♀; Socorro Co., Cibola NF: South Baldy meadow (MG2); 33.9911° N, 107.1837° W; elev. 3178 m; 16 Jun. 2017; J.A. Fowler leg.; BBSL1070450 • 1 ♀; Carrizozo; [33.64° N, 105.88° W]; 9 Jun. 1950; L.D. Beamer leg.; SEMC. – Utah • 2 ♀♀; Beaver Co., Milford (UT 21, mi. 60); [38.434° N, 113.289° W]; 3 Jun. 1994; G. Bryant leg.; ex Argemone; BBSL FaunalSurvey No. 000 085 362, FaunalSurvey No. 000 085 363 • 1 ♀; Washington Co., Central; [37.42° N, 113.62° W]; 19 Sep. 1956; Knowlton and Goodarzi leg.; ex Chrysothamnus sp.; SEMC. – Wyoming • 1 ♀; Platte Co., Warm Spring, Camp Guernsey; [42.26° N, 104.76° W]; elev. 1372 m; 6 Jun. 2000; P.M. Pineda, J. Schmidt leg.; CSUC. Description Female COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue to olive green; clypeus apex black; labrum reddish brown; mandible orange with black base and red apex; flagellum dark reddish brown dorsally, light brown ventrally. Pronotal lobe reddish brown; legs dark reddish brown; tegula black to reddish brown; wing membrane hyaline, veins with subcosta dark brown, otherwise light brown. Metasoma black with rims of terga and sterna broadly translucent brown. PUBESCENCE. Body pile colour white. Tomentum dense on gena anteriorly, pronotal collar and lobe, space between pronotal lobe and tegula, metanotum anteriorly, T2–T3 basolaterally, and T4 througout; sparse on paraocular area and metepisternum. Mesoscutum pubescence thin to moderately plumose. Wing setae dark, short and dense. Acarinarial fan complete, dense. T2 fringes dense, T3 fringes dense. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus shiny, with punctures dense in basal fourth (IS ≤1 PD), large and irregularly sparse apically (IS <2 PD); supraclypeal area shiny, with punctures dense (IS ≤1 PD); paraocular area shiny, with punctures dense (IS <1 PD), sparser around antenna socket (IS ≤ 1 PD); frons shiny, with punctures dense (IS <1 PD); vertex shiny, with punctures dense laterally (IS <1 PD), fine and sparse medially (IS = 1–3 PD); gena shiny, with punctures fine, moderately dense (IS = 1–2 PD); postgena shiny, becoming lineolate posteriorly. Tegula punctures fine, sparse (IS = 1–3 PD); mesoscutum shiny, becoming weakly tessellate anteromedially, with punctures moderately dense (IS = 1–2 PD), becoming dense on lateral and posterior margins (IS <1 PD); scutellum shiny, with punctures dense (IS <1 PD); metapostnotum weakly tessellate, with rugae strong, anastomosing, reaching posterior margin; preëpisternum shiny with crowded punctures (IS = 0 PD); hypoepimeron shiny, with punctures crowded (IS = 0 PD); mesepisternum shiny, with punctures dense (IS <1 PD); metepisternum weakly rugulose; propodeum lateral surface tessellate, posterior surface tessellate. T1 anterior slope weakly coriarious, disc shiny, with punctures moderately dense (IS = 1–2 PD), becoming fine and moderately sparse on rim (IS = 1–3 PD) and absent in small subapicolateral boss; T2 disc shiny, with punctures moderately dense (IS = 1–2 PD), apical rim shiny, with punctures fine, moderately sparse (IS = 1–3 PD). STRUCTURE. Face length/width ratio 0.8 (± 0.01 SD); clypeus apicolateral denticles rounded acute points; gena/eye width ratio 0.96 (± 0.06 SD). Pronotal angle obtuse; intertegular span 0.85 (± 0.07 SD) mm; mesoscutum length/width ratio 0.88 (± 0.03 SD); mesoscutum/scutellum length ratio 2.88 (± 0.17 SD); scutellum/metanotum length ratio 1.6 (± 0.2 SD); metanotum/metapostnotum length ratio 0.75 (±0.11 SD); forewing with 3 submarginal cells; tegula enlarged, reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum; inner margin concave; tegula length 0.42 (± 0.03 SD) mm, width 0.21 (± 0.01 SD) mm; propodeum lateral carinae not reaching dorsal margin; oblique carina strong, straight. T2 depressed apical rim less than 50% of tergum. (n = 9) VARIATION. The tegula punctures can vary from dense (IS ≤ 1 PD) to sparse (IS = 1–3 PD), the inner posterior margin can be straight or weakly concave, the T1–T2 apical rim punctures can vary from moderately dense (IS = 1–2 PD) to sparse (IS = 1–3 PD), and the supraclypeal area is sometimes black or brassy. Male COLOURATION. Head and mesosoma blue to blue-green; clypeus apex black; labrum black; mandible orange with black base and red apex; flagellum black dorsally, light brown ventrally. Pronotal lobe dark brown; legs brown; tegula dark reddish brown; wing membrane hyaline, veins with subcosta dark brown, otherwise brown to light brown. Metasoma black with depressed apical rims of terga and sterna and downcurved lateral areas of terga translucent brown. PUBESCENCE. Body pile colour white. Tomentum dense on pronotal collar; sparse on paraocular area and gena. Mesoscutum pubescence simple to sparsely plumose. Wing setae dark, short and sparse. Sterna pubescence moderately short (1–2 OD), sparsely plumose, sparse. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Clypeus shiny, with punctures dense (IS <1 PD); supraclypeal area shiny, with punctures dense (IS <1 PD); paraocular area shiny, with punctures dense (IS <1 PD); frons shiny, with punctures crowded (IS = 0 PD); vertex shiny, with punctures dense laterally (IS <1 PD), moderately dense medially (IS = 1–2 PD); gena shiny, with punctures fine, moderately sparse (IS = 1–2 PD); postgena lineate. Tegula punctures crowded (IS = 0 PD); mesoscutum shiny, becoming weakly tessellate anteromedially, with punctures dense (IS ≤ 1 PD), becoming sparse anteromedially (IS = 1–3 PD); scutellum shiny, with punctures dense (IS <1 PD), becoming sparser medially (IS = 1–2 PD); metanotum shiny and finely, densely punctate (IS <1 PD); metapostnotum shiny, with rugae strong, anastomosing, reaching posterior margin; preëpisternum areolate; hypoepimeron shiny, with punctures crowded (IS = 0 PD); mesepisternum shiny, with punctures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.051

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207