MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894116610 · doi:10.5284/1131834

Church of St. John the Baptist, Aldenham

2014· article· en· W6894116610 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArchaeology and ancient environmental studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStratigraphyNatural (archaeology)Architecture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the faculty requirements, the Heritage Network was commissioned to undertake a programme of archaeological monitoring during the groundworks for the construction of an exterior access ramp at the Church of St John the Baptist, Church Lane, Aldenham, Herts. The present project is part of an ongoing scheme of works to improve the facilities at the church. The groundworks consisted of an area of ground reduction, which measured 19m in length and 1.80m in width, on the north side of the church. The ground was reduced by 0.12m across the whole area, removing an existing tarmac surface. Two narrow channels, 0.35m in width and between 0.30m in depth at the western end and 0.45m in depth at the eastern end, were created on the northern and southern sides, leaving a central island. The stratigraphy exposed in the sections below the tarmac comprised a layer of very dark greyish brown (10YR 3/2) friable silty clay topsoil, 0.10m in depth, above a dark yellowish brown (10YR 3/4) sandy silty clay subsoil, over 0.30m in depth. This has been interpreted as a cemetery soil. The natural substratum was not reached during the present works and no evidence for cut graves or other archaeological features was observed. The only finds noted were unstratified artefacts, largely of post-medieval date, although two sherds of Hertfordshire Greyware pottery, of 12th-14th century date, were noted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesFrench-language works237,207