Bibliographic record
Abstract
Telopelopia okoboji (Walley) (Fig. 5 I–L; 7 E, F) Material examined. CANADA: Manitoba, Lake Winnipeg, Victoria Beach, 2 males, 25.vii. 1969; Pine Dock, 2 males, 31.vii. 1969. South Basin, 3 prepupa larvae, 4.–17. vii.1969. The hypopygium is illustrated (Fig. 7 E–F). Some specimens had 1 seta on the preepisternum. Fourth instar larva (n = 3, except when otherwise stated) Total length 6.54–7.87 mm. Head capsule length 0.61–0.67mm. Head. Apex of antenna as in Fig. 5 I. Lengths of antennal segments (in µm): 202–234; 38–43; 6–7; 3–4. AR 4.25–4.75. Basal segment 24–26, 1 wide; ring organ 0.69–0.73 from base; blade 49 µm (1); accessory blade 17 µm (1) long. Apical style of second segment 7–8 µm long. Apex of labrum as in Fig. 5 J. Mandible 105–120µm long. Basal segment of maxillary palp 40–46µm long, 10–12µm wide. Ligula (Fig. 5 K) 58–74 µm long. Paraglossa (Fig. 5 K) 24–30 µm long. Abdomen. Procercus 116–130µm long, 32–39µm wide, 2.95–3.44times as long as wide. Anal setae 515–650 µm, Sa 380–491 µm, supraanal seta/anal setae 0.71–0.78. Anal tubules 200–260 µm long. Posterior parapods 454– 630, 520 long. Pupa (n = 2, based on prepupae) Thoracic horn (Fig. 5 L) 405–410 µm long, 134–135 µm wide. Thoracic comb with 10–11 spines, the longest 50–60 µm. Remarks. Most measurements fit well with the measurements given by Roback (1981: 127) except that the AR of these specimens are higher. Distribution. T. okoboji is known from Manitoba, Minnesota, Iowa, Ohio, Maryland, Virginia, Kansas and New Mexico (Oliver et al. 1990: 14, Ashe & O’Connor 2009: 235).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".