MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894128837 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6255545

Scotinotylus vernalis Emerton 1882

2006· article· en· W6894128837 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCollembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermathecaNothingTaxonomy (biology)Paratype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scotinotylus vernalis (Emerton 1882) (Figs 33–36) Material examined.— Canada: Québec: Gatineau; Aylmer, Musée Canadien de la Nature back yard [45°23’N, 75°50’W] 29.vii.–04.viii.1999, pitfall in poplar forest, 1Ψ, N. Dupérré (CPAD). Diagnosis.— Males are distinguished by the tightly­coiled tailpiece (TP) (Fig. 33), and the palpal tibia with two small pointed palpal tibial apophyses (PTA) (Fig. 35). The female epigynum is characterised by the presence of a large tongue­like process (arrow), and widely separated spermathecae (S) (Fig. 36). Distribution.— From Saskatchewan and Québec (this record), south to Nebraska and Connecticut (Buckle et al. 2001). Remark.— This is a rarely collected species and nothing is known on its habitat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it