Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the result of a condition on the planning consent for the refurbishment of numbers 3 and 4 Ditchmore Lane, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, to create residential accommodation, the refurbishment of number 5 to create staff accommodation and training facilities, the refurbishment and extension of number 6 to provide hostel accommodation, and the erection of five single storey dwellings in the existing gardens, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the owners to undertake a programme of archaeological investigation. The programme includes the recording of the existing buildings on the site, and the evaluation of the archaeological potential of the rear gardens by trial trenching. The present interim report covers the evaluation stage and provides sufficient information to allow the LPA to consider whether or not the development groundworks can be allowed to proceed. Four trial trenches were excavated across the site of the proposed development. In addition, the excavation of five percolation test-pits was monitored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it