MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894132465 · doi:10.5284/1111049

Falcon House, 2 Stortford Road, Standon

2015· article· en· W6894132465 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrenchFalconBrickSituated

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Groudnworks for an extension to the outbuilding was granted by East Hertfordshire District Council subject to an archaeological condition. Falcon House is situated on the eastern side of the junction of Stortford Road and the High Street, near the centre of Standon. The study area comprises a Grade II listed building, the former Falcon public house, its outbuildings and grounds. The Falcon is first documented in a will from 1686 and its location in the historic core of Standon would suggest that it is occupying a site that has been used since at least the medieval period. The groundworks consisted of a single trench. The trench was 0.6m wide, between 1.1m and 1.5m deep and had a total length of 11.55m. No archaeological features were seen in the trench. A late 19th century or early 20th century red brick service structure was encountered in the south eastern end of the trench along with a 20th century drain and concrete building footings. The investigation has concluded that the concrete footings for the extension to the outbuilding will not impact upon any archaeology and that any archaeological features, finds or deposits will be preserved in situ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.416
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4160.058

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207