MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894139356 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7713978

Real-Time Transient Simulation Based on a Robust Two-Layer Network Equivalent

2007· article· en· W6894139356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Robustness (evolution)Electric power systemOscilloscopeControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)Stability (learning theory)Power system simulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time digital simulation of large power systems requires not only significant computational power but also simpler and accurate models. This paper proposes a new approach for transient simulation of power systems using a robust two-layer network equivalent model and an advanced PC-Cluster based parallel real-time simulator. Using a combination of well established fitting and optimization methods, the generated low-order model is of high accuracy compared to its full model over a wide frequency bandwidth. The merits of this method are its robustness in terms of stability and positive-realness, its accuracy at not only transient frequencies but also at dc and power frequency, and its optimal order determination feature. To validate the new method, a realistic large-scale power system—the Alberta Interconnected Electric System—is simulated in real-time. The real-time electromagnetic transient program is implemented in C++ language using object-oriented programming techniques on the PC Cluster. A time-step of 20 microseconds has been used for the real-time simulation. The captured oscilloscope results demonstrate excellent accuracy and efficiency of the proposed model in comparison to a full-scale off-line simulation of the original system in the ATP version of EMTP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207