Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wiedemannia hastata (Mik) (Fig. 4) Clinocera hastata Mik, 1880: 349. Type locality: Tyrolis / Achenthal (= Achental, Tirol, Austria). Wiedemannia aerea Vaillant, 1967: 271. Type locality: Torrent de la Roche Noire, Hautes Alpes, France. Syn. nov. Type material examined. Wiedemannia hastata: LECTOTYPE ♁ by present designation: label 1: Tyrolis, Achenthal, 28.7.87, Mik; label 2: 28.7.87 (3); label 3: hastata?; label 4: hastata?, det. Mik (all labels white, glued to slide) (NHMW). Slide mounted in Canada balsam with red lectotype label, handwritten: Wiedemannia hastata Mik, Lectotypus, Wagner 2022 (Fig. 4a). PARALECTOTYPES: 1 ♁, 1 ♀, on single pin: label 1 printed: Schizo (???); label 2: Robert Maq; label 3: unidentifiable; label 4, handwritten: Chamaedipsia / hastata / det. Engel; 1 ♀, label 1: Gmunden, Schiner; label 2: hastata det Mik —both labels white without date; 1 ♀, label 1: Tyrolis, Achenthal; label 2: 28.7.87 (3); label 3: hastata? / hastata? det Mik (all labels white); 1 ♀ [abdomen missing] label 1: Tyrolis / Achenthal 28.7.87 (label white) (all NHMW). Lectotype and paralectotypes by present designation in order to fix the identity of the species, all material deposited in the collection of the Natural History Museum Vienna (NHMW). Wiedemannia aerea: 2 ♁ on single slide, label 1 (pencil): gen. comparer avec sp. (change) Sp. Le Lez à Mensac, TÊTE; label 2 (ink): Wiedemannia (Chamaedipsia) aerea Vaillant ♁ ♁, Torrent de la Roche Noire, Hautes Alpes [à 2 050 m], 15.ix.1966; label 3 (printed, slide no. GBIFCH00596291). The well sclerotized male on the right side is selected as lectotype by present designation (red label: Lectotype -arrow towards specimen— Wagner 2022) (Fig. 4b). Additional material examined. 1 ♁, 1 ♀, Col du Galibier (Hautes Alpes), 15.9.1966 (ink); F. Vaillant (printed); (slide no. GBIFCH00596292); 1 ♁, label 1 (ink): Wiedemannia (Chamaedipsia) area Vaillant 1967 ♁ HOLOTYPE; label 2 (pencil and ink): Le Lez, Mensac, 1,100m, 24.viii.1974 (slide no. GBIFCH00596293, MZLS) (Fig. 4c); 1 ♁, label 1: Wiedemannia (Chamaedipsia) area (black ink), Gen profil, BBB (blue ink); label 2 white with red margin:? paratype? MZL 2021; label 3: Le Lez, Mensac, 1,100m, 24.VIII.1974 paratype 2 GG MZL 2020 (blue ink) (slide no. GBIFCH00596294, MZLS). Remarks. Only two males (on a single slide) were identified that matched the stated type locality ‘Torrent de la Roche Noire’ and date; he also collected a female (femelle) but it was not found. All other specimens are from later years from the type locality and other sites. The designation of a ‘holotype’ on the slide from Le Lez (Fig. 4c) (see above GBIFCH00596293) written later by Vaillant is invalid. Wiedemannia hastata Mik and W. aerea Vaillant are morphologically indistinguishable. Engel’s figure of W. hastata (1940, pl. XI, fig. 84) shows a small apical division of the clasping cercus; however, this was not found in any male of the type-material and a crack where it might be broken was not found. General differences in male terminalia appear to be dependent on the different treatment methods and drawing abilities of the authors. Wiedemannia hastata is probably endemic to the highest reaches of the Alps.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".