Stenus perpinguis Puthz 2012, nov.sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stenus perpinguis nov.sp. (Figs 4, 20, 66) Type material: Holotype () and 9, 13 - paratypes: Taiwan: Nantou Hsien: Yushan National Park, Mun-Li Cliff, 2700m, 18.V.1991, A. Smetana (T 86). Paratypes: 2, 6: ibidem, 13.V.1991, idem (T 79). Chiayi Hsien: 3, 12: ibidem, 27.IV.1990, idem (T 28); 3, 1: Yushan National Park, Ta-Ta Ghia, 2750m, 27.IV.1990, idem (T 27).- HT and PTT in coll. Smetana (Ottawa), PTT also in cN and in cP. Description: About as in S. persubtilis nov.sp. Length: 3.0- 3.7mm (forebody: 1.6-1.8mm). PM of the HT: HW: 32; DE: 16; PW: 25; PL: 25; EW: 30; EL: 26; SL: 20. Male: Metasternum broadly and shallowly impressed, punctation coarse and dense, interstices smaller than half diameter of punctures. Anterior sternites simple, sternite 5 with a very short, broad, shallow, impunctate impression near posterior margin, sternite 6 and 7 each with a broad and deep median impression, which is extremely finely and densely punctate and pubescent, posterior margin very shallowly emarginate. Sternite 8 (fig. 4). Sternite 9 with long, light apicolateral teeth. Aedeagus (fig. 20), median lobe triangularly narrowed, apex acute, expulsion hooks contiguous; parameres much longer than median lobe, with about 10+2 long setae in apical third. Female: Sternite 8 at posterior margin slightly projecting, rounded. Apicolateral tooth of valvifer long. Spermatheca (fig. 66), infundibulum narrow and long. Distinctly larger than S. persubtilis, median portion of frons comparatively flat, not distinctly exceeding beyond the level of medial eye margins. Pronotum and elytra with very deep impressions, median impression of pronotum broad and broadly impunctate. Abdominal punctation less dense than in S. persubtilis, interstices on tergite 7 distinctly larger than punctures. Comparative notes: This new species is the largest of the Taiwanese species of the S. cephalotes -group. Beside of the sexual characters it may be distinguished from most of the close relatives by the strong impunctate median impression of the pronotum and by the relatively sparse punctation of the posterior abdomen. Etymology: Because of its robust habitus I name this species " perpinguis " (Lat.= very plump).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".