59 High Street, Buntingford, Herts.: Archaeological Evaluation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to characterise the archaeological potential of the site of a proposed new development on land to the rear of 59 High Street, Buntingford, Hertfordshire, the Heritage Network was commissioned by Southbeach Developments Ltd to undertake an archaeological field evaluation. This work was a requirement of the planning consent granted by the local planning authority. Two trial trenches were excavated across the footprint of the proposed new dwellings. This revealed several phases of activity towards the front of the site, most likely associated with the use of the site as a farmyard during the 18th-19th century. More significant was the identification of a heavily truncated pit in this area which contained remains of Romano-British date. This represents the first stratified evidence of activity of this date in the area On the basis of these results, the risk that the development might encounter archaeological remains of significance may be considered to be Moderate for the Romano British period and Low for all other periods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it