Stenus persculptus Puthz 2012, nov.sp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stenus persculptus nov.sp. (Figs 9, 25, 56) Type material: Holotype () and 1, 3 - paratypes: Taiwan: Kaohsiung Hsien: Kuanshan Trail above Kaunshanchi Riv., 2650m, 21.IV.1992, A. Smetana (T 95). Paratypes: 2, 2: ibidem 2550m, 21.IV.1992, idem (T 96); 2, 1: ibidem 2400m, idem (T 94); 2, 4: ibidem 2400m, 20.VII.1993, idem (T 158); 4, 7: ibidem 2550, 22.VII.1993, idem (T 160); 1: Kuanoshing Hut, 2950m, 18.IV.1992, idem (T 93); 6, 3: Pingtung Hsien: Peitawushan, Kuai-Ku Hut, 2125m, 22.IV.1992, idem (T 102); 10, 7: ibidem 2130m, 30.IV.1992, idem (T 108); 12, 27: Peitawushan ridge, 2800-2900m, 28.IV.1992, idem (T 105); 16, 7: Peitawushan above Kuai-Ku Hut, 2680m, 29.IV.1992, idem (T 106); 8, 17: ibidem 2750m, 29.IV.1992, idem (T 107); 2: Peitawushan trail at 1500m, 1.V.1992, idem (T 110).- HT and PTT in coll. Smetana (Ottawa), PTT also in cT and in cP. Description:Asin S. persculpturatus nov.sp. Length: 2.8-3.3mm (forebody: 1.5-1.6mm). PM of the HT: HW: 30.5; DE: 15.5; PW: 22.5; PL: 23; EW: 27.2; EL: 24; SL: 18.5 Male: Metasternum shallowly impressed, moderately coarsely, densely punctate. Ventral abdominal characters as in S. persculpturatus, but sternite 8 slightly deeper emarginate, emargination as deep as one fifth of the length of sternite. Aedeagus (fig. 25) very close to that of S. persculpturatus, but the apical portion of the median lobe more acute, the expulsion hooks different in shape. Female: Sternite 8 at posterior margin triangularly projecting, apex nearly acute (fig. 9). Spermatheca (fig. 56), infundibulum short and broad. Comparative notes:Inmostrespectsas S. persculpturatus, but the abdominal thread-like margination distinct and complete and the bump like elevated median portion of frons slightly broader impunctate. To identify this species examination of the sexual characters is necessary. Etymology: Since the impressions on pronotum and elytra are very distinct, I name this new species " persculptus " (Lat. = distinctly sculptured).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".