MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894216424 · doi:10.5443/724

Lemming abundance and habitat selection at Walker Bay, Nunavut

2016· dataset· en· W6894216424 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Polar Data Network · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVisual Attention and Saliency Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbundance (ecology)HabitatSelection (genetic algorithm)Mark and recaptureTrappingSexual selection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We monitor lemming abundance using two methods. (1) Capture-marking-recapture by live trapping animals using Longworth traps on twelve 0.36 grids (25 live-trap stations) and one 9-ha grid (100 live traps) in mixed heath/wetland habitats. The 12 small grids have been sampled in 1996, 1997, 1999, 2004, 2007 and 2009. The large grid was sampled in 2004 and 2007. Trapping sessions last for 3 days and occur only once during the summer in June/July. We identify all animals to species and age class and also determine the reproductive condition of all captured animals. (2) Survey of lemming winter nests after snow-melt in our live-trapping grids in mid-June (2007 and 2009).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it