Amblyaspis tatika Awad & Krogmann & Talamas 2023, comb. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amblyaspis tatika (Szabó, 1977), comb. nov. (Fig. 5D) Trichacis tatika Szabó, 1977: 145 Type material examined. Holotype ♀, Tatika, 12 September 1952, Kaszab (HNHM). Molecular analysis. The ASAP analysis revealed that all 170 records from Europe were conspecific and formed a clade with high support (Supplemental File 2). These records came from Belarus, Bulgaria, England, Germany, Finland, and Norway. Worldwide DNA barcode data from BOLD and GBOL indicated the existence of 11 to 13 species of Trichacis based on partitioning. The best ASAP score indicated the presence of 11 species, while the maximum likelihood tree recovered 13 distinct clades that could be considered putative species. Of the 13 putative species on the tree, seven species were recorded only from Canada, two species from Canada and the USA, one from Tennessee, one from Florida, and one from Honduras. Backbone support was low, although the resulting tree places Isocybus as sister to Trichacis (Fig. 6).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".