Histoire des services de santé, des services sociaux et de la Direction de la protection de la jeunesse au Nunavik
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ensemble de données a été produit dans le cadre du projet "Transformation et nature des relations entre les Inuit et les professionnels des services de santé, des services sociaux et de la Direction de la protection de la jeunesse" mené par la Chaire de recherche Sentinelle Nord sur les relations avec les sociétés inuit (Université Laval) en 2021et 2022. Le projet comportait trois objectifs principaux : 1) Explorer l’histoire de ces relations et leurs transformations au cours du siècle dernier jusqu'en 1996 ; 2) Connaître les perspectives et les souvenirs des Inuit vis-à-vis des services et des professionnels ; et enfin, 3) Documenter les perspectives et la nature des expériences vécues par les anciens professionnels de ces services. Les données ont été récoltées grâce à 28 entretiens semi-dirigés menés avec d'anciers membres du personnel inuit et non inuit. Sont accessibles présentement avec le jeu: document "Accès aux données" et grilles d'entretien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".