MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6894270555 · doi:10.5683/sp3/ncc40w

Data for: Permafrost thaw induces short term increase in vegetation productivity in northwestern Canada

2022· dataset· en· W6894270555 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaUniversité LavalWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostNormalized Difference Vegetation IndexTransectVegetation (pathology)Active layerProductivityClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains active layer thickness and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data for 135 permafrost monitoring sites located across a 10° latitudinal transect of the Northwest Territories, Canada. Included are two .csv files that contain the yearly active layer thickness and NDVI values for each site and the rate of change through time for both of those variables at each site. The rates of change were divided into early and late time periods (Early, 1984 to 2000; Late, 2001 to 2019). Additional site characteristics and climatic variables are included in the data files. Active layer thickness data was derived from ground thermal and thaw tube data that was collected by the Geological Survey of Canada across the network of permafrost monitoring sites. An R script outlining the statistical analyses for the publication “Permafrost thaw induces short term increase in vegetation productivity in the northwestern Arctic-Boreal” is included, as well as a text file which includes the code used to calculate NDVI from a collection of Landsat images processed in Google Earth Engine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.100

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→