Land to the South of Haddenham Airfield, Area A: Zone 6, Haddenham, Buckinghamshire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In response to a condition on the outline planning consent for the redevelopment of land to the south of Haddenham Airfield, Haddenham, Bucks, the Heritage Network was commissioned by the developers of Zones 2 and 6 to undertake a programme of archaeological monitoring of ground reduction across both Zones. The present groundworks lay within previously identified areas of archaeological potential. It was considered that the present investigation had the potential to contribute to a greater understanding of the origins and development of Haddenham from the prehistoric period onwards. The archaeological fieldwork in Zones 6 and 2 identified a number of linear features, together with a probable post-medieval quarry pit. The majority of the linear features appeared to represent either medieval plough furrows, related to the blocks of ridge and furrow cultivation previously recorded across the entire site. Two other linear features [A103] and [E103]) appear to represent post-medieval drainage trenches. A section excavated through a long north-west to south-east aligned linear feature in Trench 2 of Zone 6 ([E101]) produced late prehistoric pottery from the ditch fill. The feature, which was observed in Zone 2 and investigated in Trenches 6 and 7 during the evaluation phase, appears to represent a major landscape feature of late Bronze Age or Early Iron Age date. The recovered evidence indicates that the site has been in use since at least the prehistoric period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".