MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894322270 · doi:10.5683/sp3/riwgvq

Enquête nationale auprès des diplômés, 1986 [Canada] : Diplômés des universités

2023· dataset· fr· W6894322270 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2023
Typedataset
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsStatistics Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Term (time)Order (exchange)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette enquête vise à déterminer dans quelle mesure les personnes ayant obtenu leur diplôme d'études postsecondaires en 1986 ont réussi à se trouver un emploi par la suite, le lien entre le programme d'études du diplômé et son emploi subséquent, la satisfaction des diplômés à l'égard de leur emploi et de leurs perspectives de carrière, les taux de sous-emploi et de chômage, le type d'emploi obtenu par rapport aux possibilités de carrière et aux qualifications exigées, et l'incidence des études postsecondaires sur la réussite professionnelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.021
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisFrench-language works237,207