MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6894323964 · doi:10.5284/1129445

CANADA WATER Plot D Rotherhithe London SE16, Archaeological and geoarchaeological watching brief report

2024· article· en· W6894323964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlluviumHoloceneFloodplainGeoarchaeologyElevation (ballistics)BoreholeAlluvial fanFluvial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Within the Plot D area a total of fifteen boreholes, drilled using cable percussion and rotary rigs, and three trial trenches were undertaken during this investigation. All boreholes and trial trenches were monitored by the geoarchaeologist who made a record of the deposit sequence. Following the fieldwork, the information from the watching brief was supplemented with additional data comprising data from other MOLA investigations, within the site and the wider area. The resulting deposit model has been used to analyse the landscape position and geological setting of the site and the sequence and distribution of deposits within the site to assess their archaeological and geoarchaeological potential. Eighteen interventions were logged by MOLA across Plot D, consisting of fifteen boreholes and three trial trenches. Of the boreholes, six encountered Holocene alluvial sediments, four of which successfully penetrated into the underlying floodplain (Shepperton) gravel strata and geological bedrock. The elevation of the Shepperton gravels (equivalent to the early Holocene surface) ranges from -3.15m OD to -6.75m OD with an average surface elevation of -5.32m OD. The early Holocene mapping indicates a gentle slope from north to south toward the Thames. The surface elevation of the alluvium ranges from 4.11m OD to -6.75m OD. The average surface elevation was -0.38m OD, and the average thickness was 2.83m. Across the bulk of the site, the alluvial deposits consisted of soft to firm grey sometimes slightly gravelly clays often with pockets of dark brown peat and occasional plant remains. Substantial truncation and/or apparent disturbed or redeposited alluvial deposits were recorded across the site (particularly in the west and in the eastern central southern area) which probably relate to the excavation and subsequent backfilling of the historic Surrey Commercial Docks. The 19th century significant Dock Walls were encountered in all three Trial Trenches (and Plot D_BH-DW01 in TT01) between approximately 0.5m and 1.25m below the modern ground surface, consisting of a thin concrete layer over yellow and brown brick

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207