MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6894456686 · doi:10.5683/sp2/wyr9mr

RSI-06: The impact of COVID-19 on personal finances in Quebec / COVID-19: l’état des finances personnelles au Québec

2020· dataset· fr· W6894456686 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2020
Typedataset
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonaCenter (category theory)Web siteContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ON RECOMMANDE AUX UTILISATEURS DE COMMENCER PAR LIRE LE FICHIER «READ ME» INCLUS DANS L’ARCHIVE, QUI CONTIENT DES INFORMATIONS IMPORTANTES ET PEUT ÊTRE OUVERT AU FORMAT TEXTE BRUT AVEC LA PLUPART DES LOGICIELS D’ÉDITION. Résumé Enquête déployée en mai 2020 par le panel Web Qu'en pensez-vous?de la firme Delvinia, pour le compte de l’Institut sur la retraite et l’épargne, de la Chaire de recherche sur les enjeux économiques intergénérationnels (CREEi) et du Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations (CIRANO) 3 009 répondants du Québec âgés de 25 à 64 ans Questions portant sur Les caractéristiques sociodémographiques Les revenus de travail et autres revenus du répondant et du conjoint ainsi que les dépenses du ménage, pour 2019, pour avril 2020 et les anticipations pour le reste de 2020 Le bilan (actifs et dettes) en date de fin 2019 et de fin avril 2020 L’emploi et les caractéristiques de l’emploi en 2019, en avril 2020 ainsi que les anticipations pour le reste de 2020 Certaines préférences et anticipations pour l’avenir USERS ARE ADVISED TO START BY READING THE “READ ME” FILE INCLUDED IN THE ARCHIVE, WHICH CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND CAN BE OPENED IN RAW TEXT FORMAT USING MOST TEXT EDITING SOFTWARES. Summary Survey fielded in May 2020 by Delvinia’s AskingCanadians web panel, on behalf of the Retirement and Savings Institute, of the Research Chair on Intergenerational Economics (CREEi) and of the Center for Interuniversity Research on Organizations (CIRANO) 3,009 respondents from Quebec, aged between 25 and 64 years old Questions on Sociodemographic characteristics Earnings and other income of the respondent and spouse as well as household spending, for 2019, for April 2020 and expectations for the rest of 2020 Balance sheet (assets and debts) as at end of 2019 and end of April 2020 Employment and its attributes in 2019, in April 2020 and expectations for the rest of 2020 Certain preferences and expectations for the future

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→