MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6894480399 · doi:10.5683/sp2/p6u9j8

Growing season trace gas and environmental measurements at an experimentally-warmed mesic tundra site

2021· dataset· en· W6894480399 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTundraSnowArcticTrace gasSnowpackWatershedHydrology (agriculture)Northern Hemisphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data set was collected as an ongoing study at the Cape Bounty Arctic Watershed Observatory International Tundra Experiment (ITEX) site examining the environmental controls over trace gas respiration in High Arctic mesic tundra. The goal of the study is to characterize the relationships between plant-available nitrogen and productivity and to see how these relationships are manifested in hyperspectral signatures. These data files contain trace gas concentrations and environmental measurements from an ITEX mesic tundra experiment. Snow fences were set up at two sites of each replicate to determine the effect of snow depth on soil respiration. Four treatments were sampled with eight replicates: snow-control, snow-warmed, control-control, and control-warmed. PVC collars (20 cm diameter) were placed on the ground from which opaque, static, non-steady state chambers were used to obtain a 25 mL sample in 12-mL pre-evacuated glass vials (Exetainer 739B, Labco Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK). Vials were analyzed using gas chromatography according to methods by Wilson and Humphreys (2010). Environmental measurements (soil moisture, soil temperature, and active layer depth) were taken twice weekly at site adjacent to the collars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealis→French-language works237,207→