MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6898789952 · doi:10.57745/qzxx5u

ANR_ArchiFluo_DataFig5b_101364OE483722_20230426_V0.tab

2023· dataset· gl· W6898789952 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherche Data Gouv France · 2023
Typedataset
Languagegl
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Process (computing)Work (physics)Product (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data of figure5b

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0430.031
Research integrity0.0080.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.856

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.575
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.097 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherche Data Gouv FranceFrench-language works237,207