An evaluative study of the school improvement process in Prince George's County Public Schools, Maryland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the school improvement process in Prince George's County Public Schools. The study sought answers to the following six questions. During the period of implementation of the Comer Process and the School Improvement Program, to what extent is high school attendance and dropout rate meeting or exceeding state standards? To what extent do Scholastic Aptitude Test scores meet or exceed state standards? During the period of implementation of the School Improvement Process, to what extent are students meeting or exceeding state standards on the Maryland Functional Tests in reading, mathematics, writing, and citizenship? During the period of implementation of Effective Schools Process and Comer Process, to what extent are elementary schools meeting or exceeding state standards for student attainment and attendance? During the period of implementation of Effective Schools Process and Comer Process, to what extent are students in meeting or exceeding state standards in reading, writing, language usage, mathematics, science and social studies? To what extent do school improvement projects/programs impact student performance? Methodology. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate data from the Maryland State Performance Report. The student performances on the Maryland State Performance Assessment Program, Maryland Functional Tests, as well as student dropout rate, attendance, and attainment, were compared to state standards. The student performances in the Authentic Teaching Learning and Assessments for all students (ATLAS) school, Milliken II schools, and a university high school program were compared with the average student performance in Prince George's County Public Schools. Results. The findings indicated student performance in Prince George's County Public Schools did not meet or exceed state standards in most categories. The ATLAS project student performance was below the average of Prince George's County Public Schools. The Milliken II High Schools performed below state standards on most categories. The university high school met or exceeded state standard percentage in all categories except attendance. Conclusion. The School Improvement Process in Prince George's County Public Schools has not made a positive impact on student performance, despite the plan's stated primary goal: "Student achievement will meet or exceed state standards." The evaluation of the School Improvement Process in this study was made solely on the basis of the failure of student performance to meet state standards in most categories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".