Analysis of the major constituents in St. John's Wort and Ephedra
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 established a formal definition of a "dietary supplement" using several criteria. Dietary supplements are products made of one or more nutrients, such as vitamins, minerals and proteins. They are intended to supplement the diet. Today many consumers use supplements without evaluating the product or considering the potential side effects. The supplement industry has increased sales into the billion of dollars in the last ten years. Liquid chromatography with ultra violet/visible, fluorescence, and mass spectrometry detection were used to measure the potentially active constituents in St. John's Wort. Additionally, measurements were carried out with spectrophotometry at 590 nm. St. John's Wort is used by consumers who have mild to moderate depression. Many clinical studies have been performed in the United States and abroad and the results are not conclusive. Four analytes are considered to possess pharmacological activity: the naphthodianthrones pseudohypericin and hypericin and the phloroglucinols hyperforin and adhyperforin. This project concentrated on measuring the naphthodianthrones because label claims are based on the level of total dianthrones and not phloroglucinols. Additionally, six alkaloids in Ephedra containing Ma Huang SRM samples were measured using liquid chromatography with two modes of detection: ultraviolet and mass spectrometry. Ephedra has six analytes which possess pharmacological activity: norephedrine and norpseudoephedrine, pseudoephedrine and ephedrine and methylephedrine and methylpseudoephedrine. Norpseudoephedrine is regulated by Drug Enforcement Agency, which is a precursor to elicit drugs. Many of the products containing Ephedra analytes are diet products and substances used to boost energy levels. The levels of the analytes vary significantly from product to product and can have severe or even deadly consequences if taken. Much research is needed for the analysis of dietary supplements. Initial studies should be performed on the plant material at various times of the year to assess the levels of potentially active analytes. Also, extraction studies are important to obtain the best method for maximum recovery of the analytes of interest. It is possible that the extraction technique could vary from plant source to finished product and an alternative technique may be needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".