Agents et acteurs locaux de la colonisation française : méthodes, sources et nouveaux enjeux de la recherche en France XVIIe-XXe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La colonisation française est encore aujourd’hui l’objet de multiples questionnements. De nombreux laboratoires présentent des axes thématiques consacrés à l’étude des différentes pratiques coloniales de la France. L’objet de cette présente journée est donc de dresser un état des lieux des problématiques émergentes et du renouvellement épistémologique que connaît la recherche française depuis ces dernières années. Cette journée pluridisciplinaire est organisée principalement à l’attention des doctorants et jeunes chercheurs. L’objectif est également de permettre la rencontre et la confrontation des disciplines telles que l’histoire, la géographie, la linguistique, l’ethnologie, le droit, l’histoire du droit et la science politique. Cette journée est organisée avec le concours de la MSHS de l’Université de La Rochelle et la participation de la Jeune Equipe « Médiane Amériques Pacifique » (MAPA JE 2434) de la FLASH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".