MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6898929371 · doi:10.58066/62jd-2421

House for W.F. Huntting, Esq., Shaughnessy Heights, Vancouver, B.C.

2023· other· en· W6898929371 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGround floorLiving roomPlan (archaeology)BasementFloor plan

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The file consists of the contract drawings (AP911-AP922, AP927), consultant's drawings (AP905-AP910) and full-scale shop drawings. A block plan, building plans, elevations, section, details and heating and electrical plans are included. Two-storey house with basement and attic. The basement includes a servant's room, bathroom, laundry, wood and coal bins, store room and wine cellar. The ground floor comprises a vestibule, hall, lavatory, drawing room, living room, dining room kitchen, pantry, larder, servant's hall and veranda. The second floor (called "first floor" on the drawing) consists of four bedrooms, two bathrooms and a balcony. Two bedrooms, two box rooms and a bathroom make up the attic. The two-bay garage has an unfinished attic. There is a later plan for a greenhouse to be attached to the garage. The contract drawings are inscribed: "This is one of the drawings referred to in our contract dated Feb [blank] 1912, Vancouver, B.C. [Signed] Macpherson & Sinclair [per] J.M.S." The heating and electrical plans were prepared by Erwin L. Weber, consulting domestic engineer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7330.409

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)French-language works237,207