Étudier la religion au Québec : regards d'ici et d'ailleurs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au Québec comme ailleurs, la religion est revenue au centre de l’actualité politique et au cœur des débats scientifiques. Qu’il s’agisse de la pluralisation ethnoreligieuse des sociétés, de la diversification postmoderne des expressions du croire, du renouvellement des demandes éthiques, de la republicisation des religions et des églises, de la poussée du populisme religieux ou plus largement de la mise en cause du paradigme moderniste de la sécularisation, les raisons ne manquent plus d’étudier la religion en société – s’il en fut jamais autrement. Afin de donner voix aux nombreux chercheurs d’ici et d’ailleurs qui étudient la religion au Québec, de faire mieux connaître leurs travaux, de stimuler les échanges, de favoriser les coopérations, et de soulever les défis et enjeux actuels et à venir, la Société québécoise pour l’étude de la religion organise, un symposium international et interdisciplinaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".