MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6899002490 · doi:10.58079/o6r

La recherche : zones de convergence et de créativité

2013· other· fr· W6899002490 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2013
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvergence (economics)PropositionContext (archaeology)ESPACE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’association francophone pour le savoir (Acfas) lance un appel de propositions en vue de son LXXXIIe congrès qui se tiendra du 12 au 16 mai 2014 sur le campus de l’université Concordia, situé en plein cœur de Montréal. Avec pour thème, La recherche : zones de convergence et de créativité, cette nouvelle édition du congrès illustrera le fait que la convergence entre les habiletés des chercheurs, les structures institutionnelles, l’environnement social ou les ressources financières permettent l’innovation et la créativité. Les espaces de recherche créent cette convergence en facilitant les interactions entre chercheurs d’horizons divers pour favoriser l’émergence de nouvelles idées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.017
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4290.252

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.110
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpenEdition (OpenEdition)French-language works237,207